From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 07:10:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E891065672 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334B98FC12 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5D7A4US085003; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:10:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5D7A4qq084840; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:10:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:10:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Brandon Falk In-Reply-To: <4FD66F7E.2060404@brandonfa.lk> Message-ID: References: <4FD66F7E.2060404@brandonfa.lk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:10:04 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Boot Times X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:10:18 -0000 > Greetings, > > I was just wondering what it is that FreeBSD does that makes it take so long > to boot. Booting into Ubuntu minimal or my own custom Linux distro, literally > takes 0.5-2 seconds to boot up to shell, where FreeBSD takes about 10-20 > seconds. I'm not sure if anything could be parallelized in the boot process, mostly kernel time. > Note: This isn't really an issue, moreso a curiosity. true. system that never crash are not often booted