Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:28:08 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> Subject: Re: buildworld times Message-ID: <20040229022808.GA32755@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040228202429.24114U-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <20040228150857.T8264-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040228202429.24114U-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 08:24:59PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > 2.5 hours seems a little high and would seem to indicate that you're > > > building world under a kernel that has all the debugging options enabled. > > > Could you make your kernel config available? > > > > Yeah, I recall that -CURRENT on a Mobile PII 366Mhz took the > > same amount of time so I would imagine the P4 would be faster since I > > remember PIII running at 800Mhz or so would take about 2 hours and the > > Athlon K7 at 1.2Ghz was about a little over an hour. I'm using the > > standard GENERIC kernel and do have the debugging options enabled. > > Turning off the debugging options (especially WITNESS) can have a dramatic > effect on performance. Give it a spin. :-) If you're into world stones as some simple measure of performance, you need to also consider malloc ln -s aj /etc/malloc.conf and you should also consider adding somethings to make.conf (e.g., NOPROFILE=true, etc.) -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040229022808.GA32755>