From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Feb 11 16:26:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mobile.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5E237B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:26:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.wemm.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1C0NxU42620; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:23:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200102120023.f1C0NxU42620@mobile.wemm.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Drew Derbyshire" Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Postfix and Majordomo security (was FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:INSERT_NUMBER_HERE) In-Reply-To: <000801c09436$87ea54c0$94cba8c0@hh.kew.com> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:23:59 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Drew Derbyshire" wrote: > I'm referring to the -outgoing filter, but stating it should also be used on > the -announce lists incoming. Well, for what its worth, both -announce and -security-notifications are moderated now (as of a day or two ago). They probably should have been all along rather than depending on the envelope from, but it is a bit late now. > > Ha! We've already been there and have gone way beyond that, is you are > > referring to the -outgoing aliases. We do not use them, so your "fix" > > is not relevant. (We did use it for a while in january last year, but we > > solved it completely since then) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message