Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:35:58 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r421549 - in head: . Mk Message-ID: <20160909083558.GA79819@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <99cd3ec3-da27-f989-97c2-c009ea80c37c@FreeBSD.org> References: <201609081315.u88DF6vL044982@repo.freebsd.org> <190e2ef5-0f8c-efc3-bca1-7e5b541d3733@FreeBSD.org> <20160909062630.hofrsvjajt2wcel4@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <99cd3ec3-da27-f989-97c2-c009ea80c37c@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:29:33PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 9/09/2016 4:26 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > In both case that means there is NO license and then we should not > > distribute them at all. > > There are cases where software has no license, the author says so, but > they mean, and/or say 'free to do with what you please'. This is neither > NONE, nor undefined (in terms of the 'terms'), nor PD, nor > 'empty(LICENSE)'. That's why I prefer something along UNCLEAR/MOOT/VAGUE/CONTROVERSIAL/etc. to cover all those "weird" cases and be done with it. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160909083558.GA79819>