Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:00:45 -0700 (MST)
From:      Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903021459280.19399-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote:

> Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's 
> recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on 
> all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count?

There's a reason we now have 3.1-STABLE.  The 2.2.* branch is dead and
eventually (probably fairly quickly) ports will stop compiling correctly
for the 2.2 branch even if they have the ports updates correctly
installed.

Brett
******************************************************************
Brett Taylor            brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu
http://peloton.physics.montana.edu/brett/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903021459280.19399-100000>