From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Mar 2 14: 2:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from peloton.physics.montana.edu (peloton.physics.montana.edu [153.90.192.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2F014EDE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:01:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu) Received: from localhost (brett@localhost) by peloton.physics.montana.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA19455; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:00:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:00:45 -0700 (MST) From: Brett Taylor To: Brett Glass Cc: Bill Fumerola , Adam Turoff , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's > recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on > all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count? There's a reason we now have 3.1-STABLE. The 2.2.* branch is dead and eventually (probably fairly quickly) ports will stop compiling correctly for the 2.2 branch even if they have the ports updates correctly installed. Brett ****************************************************************** Brett Taylor brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu http://peloton.physics.montana.edu/brett/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message