From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Oct 2 11:22:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611F8A0EB76 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from smtp.mimar.rs (smtp.mimar.rs [193.53.106.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 136AB1C7F for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B77D89B65 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:22:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject :subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t= 1443784946; x=1445599347; bh=1ruQwQBTI4MrbvgcQZPFkzq37/gPusT87Hb +FB1CbUA=; b=OjTvzUT2bhFvb5vaISZZ9fNNGHwoJRfnySE2zpOAa5UFSfQV60i 8qw2dj4itmQfsIH43VQwQesadbk8AElTv09/Mbip942KRswNGbzGxnlxikgB/3KY +JpySXd7ltIC0LL+svIOicbcQ5/dcqABZjSRQSkNrzd4F/1QIIuS+tGw= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from smtp.mimar.rs ([193.53.106.135]) by vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id RfidZ8f4wMTr for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:22:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from efreet.kappastar.com (nat-nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4134289B54 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:22:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:22:25 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommended poudriere jail versions? Message-ID: <20151002132225.5b888ebf@efreet.kappastar.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20151001103206.2d2603a4@efreet.kappastar.com> Organization: mimar X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:22:39 -0000 On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:05:32 +0200 Mark Martinec wrote: > 2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: > > what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? > > So far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every > > minor version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, > > but I ended up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and > > 10.2), where I need to > > rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is > > starting to take too much of my time. > >=20 > > I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per > > architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built > > on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for > > 10.2- on 10.1-? >=20 > I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have, > but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on > 10.0-RELEASE and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I > think the official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE . >=20 > This mostly works, except for a port like virtualbox-ose-kmod, > which causes a kernel crash when built on 10.0-RELEASE and run > on 10.2. So after each ports upgrade when noticing that pkg > is reinstalling virtualbox-ose-kmod, I re-build this one from > ports on a target host, otherwise the next reboot will end up > crashing on loading a vboxdrv kernel module during startup. Thanx for info. I'd like to give building everything on 10.1-RELEASE- a try, but I don't see the ability of poudriere to specify patclevel when using ftp method - it always fetches the latest one. Is this by design, to discourage building on potentially vulnerable versions, or just non-implemented functionality? Regards, --=20 Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs/