From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 09:09:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2EE16A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610DD43D39 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meno.abels@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so30111rnf for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:09:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=F18ugbK6dCZ8kJCfUnB2m/8L5gpxasm6OIdTs3XTOwlzk4NJqyyoAwZrU0BPtYZVYrpBwBzFAtlHxyScWc2h3Rv8cBQyqnQmciJHWybR42eCYlZ4Hsj/M5jK1ejloDXCuv7Bjpn7b+Od+FcBQWdyr0QHTZTJiO4JvQMqZ0loXUg= Received: by 10.38.79.53 with SMTP id c53mr165859rnb; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.82.41 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 01:09:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <344de28704110501091ba34dde@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:09:49 +0100 From: Meno Abels To: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20041103182806.GA1040@adv.devet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <34cb7c8404110209563fc01498@mail.gmail.com> <20041103182806.GA1040@adv.devet.org> Subject: Re: if_sk patch to get more info from people with problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: meno.abels@adviser.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 09:09:50 -0000 Hello, i tested the patch from Peter Edwards on my: ASUS K8V SE Deluxe using 5.3-RC2/amd64 but the problem is still there. First my dhclient didn't pick a number only after ifconfig sk0 down/up. And my huge transfer test which run on 100baseFX, which transfers 200GB of data in both direction is still not runs through. The same test on the same hardware with fedora-2(linux) runs without any problem. So we still didn't got the point. It is better than before but the problem is still there. In my system there is also a cheap realtec nic also which get also in trouble with my transfer test. So it could be that our problem is not nic related but this is on an hypothesis. I tried to compare the linux and the freebsd driver, but the linux driver is more the complex in the scope of the freebsd driver. I still get in dmesg some size errors and checksum problems. meno