Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:09:56 -0600
From:      Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
To:        Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Proposal: Union mount of fdesc on top of /dev
Message-ID:  <20000327180956.L18325@holly.calldei.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003270836460.48610-100000@lion.butya.kz>
References:  <20000317230632.I24374@holly.calldei.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003270836460.48610-100000@lion.butya.kz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, March 27, 2000, Boris Popov wrote:
> 	While this may help in the non-devfs case it is not valid for
> devfs, because devfs is able to handle such things natively and union
> mount is just an additional overload.

   At its current pace, however, devfs will be complete and ready
for production roughly 30 minutes after the Sun explodes.

-- 
|Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
|Why do we want intelligent terminals when there are so many stupid users?
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000327180956.L18325>