Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:39:44 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        coredump@nervosa.com (invalid opcode)
Cc:        pst@shockwave.com, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin
Message-ID:  <199602151839.LAA02664@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960214230500.234B-100000@nervosa.com> from "invalid opcode" at Feb 14, 96 11:05:10 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Well in that case, the identd port needs to be update, ill email the 
> maintainer, still wondering about the man pages though.
> Also, what exactly do you mean by "standalone", in.telnetd could be 
> classified as standalone, couldn't it?

Only if compiled that way.

The default is to require inetd.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602151839.LAA02664>