From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Feb 15 10:42:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA14546
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 10:42:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA14541
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 10:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA02664; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:39:44 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199602151839.LAA02664@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin
To: coredump@nervosa.com (invalid opcode)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:39:44 -0700 (MST)
Cc: pst@shockwave.com, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960214230500.234B-100000@nervosa.com> from "invalid opcode" at Feb 14, 96 11:05:10 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Well in that case, the identd port needs to be update, ill email the 
> maintainer, still wondering about the man pages though.
> Also, what exactly do you mean by "standalone", in.telnetd could be 
> classified as standalone, couldn't it?

Only if compiled that way.

The default is to require inetd.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.