From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 15 8:45: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from relay.ucb.crimea.ua (relay.ucb.crimea.ua [212.110.138.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A653914A2F for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 08:39:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@ucb.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by relay.ucb.crimea.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3/UCB) id SAA33368; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 18:39:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 18:39:26 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Call for review] init(8): new feature Message-ID: <19990615183926.A31280@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Mail-Followup-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=AhhlLboLdkugWU4S X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, hackers! While the -core is busy to review/approve this patch, I would like to know your opinion. What do you think of it? Thanks, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: (from ru@localhost) by relay.ucb.crimea.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3/UCB) id XAA18478; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 23:41:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 23:40:59 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: dg@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org, phk@freebsd.org, des@freebsd.org Subject: init(8): new feature request Message-ID: <19990611234059.A7733@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi! We have a lot of PRs (5451, 9066, 10035) complaining the lack of running /etc/rc.shutdown from shutdown(8)/reboot(8). In fact, there are two ways to cleanly (with /etc/rc.shutdown) reboot the system: - send init(8) SIGINT signal; - run shutdown(8) without ``-r'' and ``-h'' switches, so it will send init(8) SIGINT signal. On the other hand, there is no easy (single-step) way to run /etc/rc.shutdown and then halt plus optionally power-off the system. The patch below (mostly from PR#5451) removes this limitation by adding two new features to init(8): - when init(8) receives SIGUSR1, it will act like in SIGINT case, but will call reboot(RB_HALT); - when init(8) receives SIGUSR2, it will act like in SIGINT case, but will call reboot(RB_HALT|RB_POWEROFF). Also, when compiled with -DCOMPAT_SYSV_INIT, it is now possible to emulate SysV's init(8) behaviour. I have tested it on my 3.2-STABLE, and it works like a charm. Very handy!!! Could you please review it? Thanks, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="init.c.patch" Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/FreeBSD-CVS/src/sbin/init/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- Makefile 1998/01/20 10:39:56 1.15 +++ Makefile 1999/06/11 20:14:19 @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ BINMODE=500 INSTALLFLAGS=-fschg CFLAGS+=-DDEBUGSHELL -DSECURE -DLOGIN_CAP +CFLAGS+=-DCOMPAT_SYSV_INIT .if exists(${.CURDIR}/../../secure) && !defined(NOCRYPT) && !defined(NOSECURE) DISTRIBUTION=des Index: init.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/FreeBSD-CVS/src/sbin/init/init.c,v retrieving revision 1.31 diff -u -r1.31 init.c --- init.c 1998/07/22 05:45:11 1.31 +++ init.c 1999/06/11 20:28:59 @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ #define TRUE 1 int Reboot = FALSE; +int howto = RB_AUTOBOOT; int devfs; @@ -203,9 +204,44 @@ errx(1, "%s", strerror(EPERM)); /* System V users like to reexec init. */ - if (getpid() != 1) - errx(1, "already running"); - + if (getpid() != 1) { +#ifdef COMPAT_SYSV_INIT + /* So give them what they want */ + if (argc > 1) { + if (strlen(argv[1]) == 1) { + register char state = *argv[1]; + register int sig; + + switch (state) { + case '0': /* halt + poweroff */ + sig = SIGUSR2; + break; + case '1': /* single user */ + case 's': + sig = SIGTERM; + break; + case '6': /* reboot */ + sig = SIGINT; + break; + case 'q': /* re-read /etc/ttys */ + sig = SIGHUP; + break; + case 'c': /* block further logins */ + sig = SIGTSTP; + break; + default: + goto usage; + } + kill(1, sig); + _exit(0); + } else +usage: + errx(1, "invalid level ``%s''\n" + "usage: init [016cqs]", argv[1]); + } else +#endif + errx(1, "already running"); + } /* * Note that this does NOT open a file... * Does 'init' deserve its own facility number? @@ -259,11 +295,13 @@ handle(badsys, SIGSYS, 0); handle(disaster, SIGABRT, SIGFPE, SIGILL, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGXCPU, SIGXFSZ, 0); - handle(transition_handler, SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGTSTP, 0); + handle(transition_handler, SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGTSTP, + SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2, 0); handle(alrm_handler, SIGALRM, 0); sigfillset(&mask); delset(&mask, SIGABRT, SIGFPE, SIGILL, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGSYS, - SIGXCPU, SIGXFSZ, SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGTSTP, SIGALRM, 0); + SIGXCPU, SIGXFSZ, SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGTSTP, SIGALRM, + SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2, 0); sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &mask, (sigset_t *) 0); sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask); sa.sa_flags = 0; @@ -598,7 +636,7 @@ sync(); alarm(2); pause(); - reboot(RB_AUTOBOOT); + reboot(howto); _exit(0); } @@ -1238,6 +1276,10 @@ case SIGHUP: requested_transition = clean_ttys; break; + case SIGUSR2: + howto = RB_POWEROFF; + case SIGUSR1: + howto |= RB_HALT; case SIGINT: Reboot = TRUE; case SIGTERM: --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message