Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 11:43:30 +0100 From: lutz@muc.de (Lutz Albers) To: terry@lambert.org Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FS PATCHES: THE NEXT GENERATION Message-ID: <v02140404ad3f7775d37c@[193.174.4.22]>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199602072029.NAA06238@phaeton.artisoft.com>, Terry Lambert writes: - -> In message <199602070026.RAA03938@phaeton.artisoft.com>you write: -> >The output doesn't look particularly useful as input to "patch" -> -> You missed the "Index:" lines that cvs diff generates; they tell patch which -> file to patch. (The FS_PATCHES.diff.gz that exists on freefall right now is -> not a context diff, btw) - -I know. That was the source of my consternation. I specified a -comamnd line of "cvs diff -c" and that is what came out. Hello, is there are reason not to use 'cvs rdiff' ? This should create patch output, at least according to the cvs man page. ciao lutz --------------------------------------------------------------------- Lutz Albers | What's good ? Luederitzstr. 14, 81929-Muenchen, Germany | Life's good - email:lutz@muc.de ph: +49-89-93940364 | But not fair at all http://www.muc.de/~lutz fax:+49-89-93940365 | (Lou Reed) Do not take life too seriously, you will never get out of it alive.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v02140404ad3f7775d37c>