From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Mar 17  9: 0:36 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mercury.hypersurf.com (mercury.hypersurf.com [206.40.40.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4350937BF6F
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:00:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sgh@hypersurf.com)
Received: from win98se (Port38.hypersurf.com [206.40.40.38])
	by mercury.hypersurf.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11564
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:00:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200003171700.JAA11564@mercury.hypersurf.com>
From: sgh@hypersurf.com
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:00:46 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: _privacy
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

   I know free_BSD has alot of loopholes but,
 I'm wondering if an SA can capture and save,
 or keep tabs on a POP session easily. I know
  they can do a traceroute but... how could a 
   POP user prevent his sessions from being
  monitered??? without encrypting everything?

end_____________________________________________________________
{{{{ Steven G. Hardy phd.}}}}  "The main differance between
  <>=-( ((( -<O>- ))) )-=<>    Republicans & Democrats is that;
 <>=--( sgh@hypersurf.com )--=<>  Republicans know everything,
  <>=----------O-----------=<>      and Democrats don't".  ;)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message