Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 03:25:38 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>, ken@kdm.org, don@calis.blacksun.org, ticso@cicely.de, grog@lemis.com, bright@wintelcom.net, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Journaling Message-ID: <19991105032538.A98956@cicely7.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <199911042326.QAA20534@usr07.primenet.com> References: <19991102134152.A18969@antioche.lip6.fr> <199911042326.QAA20534@usr07.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 11:26:32PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > NetBSD currently supports 16. > > > > > > Yes, it breaks backward compatability. > > > > No, NetBSD supports 16 only on ports that started with 16. > > Other still are 8. There are discussions about how to move to a higther > > number (not 16, but at last 64 or more) without breacking backward > > compatability ... > > You can't cross mount media between OSs with the same byte ordering. > The difference between FreeBSD-i386 and alpha produces the same kind of frustration. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991105032538.A98956>