From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 5 6:46:54 2001 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 06:46:53 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.megatrends.com (mail2.megatrends.com [155.229.80.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3589B37B400 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 06:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by ATL_MS1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:42:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1355693A51C0D211B55A00105ACCFE6496DA8F@ATL_MS1> From: Gene Rovang To: "'questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Cooperation on Dual NIC Support for Intel 10/100 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:42:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We are currently in development for a late Q1 release of our BSD-based kernel NAS server with Netbench performance already saturating the 10/100 ethernet port. The problem is we have a second ethernet port already on our CDROM sized Motherboard that can handle more throughput if we just had a load balancing driver. Has anyone been approached or is currently working on a dual NIC driver? We have a whole host of side issues about clustering, etc.? Who can we begin talking with on a regular basis for cooperative collaberations? Gene Rovang Manager - Remote Server Mgmt., Internet & Network Appliance Labs Email : gener@ami.com Phone: 770-246-8600 ext. 7270