Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:11:09 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To:        Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Subject:   Re: Upcoming Releases
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.20.1603152209110.3734@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBC62E3B-B07D-4A3F-AD22-E3EB62484725@lafn.org>
References:  <EEFD0376-2038-4801-9A7A-BF342B66F029@lafn.org> <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> <DE7BAC1A-0B40-4B2A-861A-6AE7B16FAC0D@lafn.org> <DBC62E3B-B07D-4A3F-AD22-E3EB62484725@lafn.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote:

> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely 
> to have the new packetized base feature.  That tells me that 11.0 is 
> most likely to be dicey to work with.  I am reminded when the new pkg 
> system came out and the supporting servers were compromised.

To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any 
compromises.

Any new release is bound to have problems.  But this one is likely to be 
smoother than most, as many of the developers and most of the cluster 
have been running -HEAD as part of the "dogfood" program.  Problems are 
found and fixed early.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1603152209110.3734>