Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:02:23 -0700
From:      Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)
Message-ID:  <20041028230223.GD2063@empiric.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org>
References:  <20041027073858.GC719@empiric.icir.org> <417FF6D6.4010201@elischer.org> <20041027195233.GC770@empiric.icir.org> <20041028114134.GC50262@cell.sick.ru> <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Looking at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/20.html I notice a
few differences. Seems to me that a route to one of the peer's other
addresses is going to be needed, and that the supernet example given
there might not work.

--84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: ''

iD8DBQFBgXp+ueUpAYYNtTsRAkowAJ0Uv20lW2DSCMSZqI4L4iFifIUIRgCgidmy
8UQFq2FOlw/icgxzBULUTVs=
=zEQD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041028230223.GD2063>