From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  5 17:41:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8706316A4CE; Sun,  5 Sep 2004 17:41:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6AC4B43D1F; Sun,  5 Sep 2004 17:41:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (adsl-64-142-31-109.sonic.net [64.142.31.109])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i85HfCwN020191
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Sun, 5 Sep 2004 10:41:13 -0700
From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>
To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040906.015751.21885686.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
References: <200409050921.i859LW66020701@repoman.freebsd.org>
	 <1094399942.767.7.camel@localhost>
	 <20040906.015751.21885686.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9sbhVLDjC6fafVfnSjJi"
Message-Id: <1094405996.767.22.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:39:57 -0700
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common
	new.sgml
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:41:13 -0000


--=-9sbhVLDjC6fafVfnSjJi
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 09:57, Hiroki Sato wrote:

> bmah> I like that the markup for library names is now consistent.  I'm no=
t
> bmah> 100% sure that <application></application> is the best choice; I us=
ually
> bmah> used <filename></filename>.  But in any case I think this change wa=
s an
> bmah> improvement.
>=20
>  Ah, actually I am still floating between the two (<application> and
>  <filename role=3D"library"> or so)  While using <filename> is good
>  for consistency since it is also used for a package name, I think libfoo
>  is a component, not just a filename... So <application> is used just
>  to keep consistency for now.  Anyway, let me sleep on it ;)

OK, sounds good, thanks.  FWIW, it's not real obvious to me what the
right choice is, so hopefully this won't keep you from getting a good
night's sleep.  :-)

Bruce.


--=-9sbhVLDjC6fafVfnSjJi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBO09s2MoxcVugUsMRAk2UAKDvdmshsFwWHg/OjrmahkkAS3q7FACdGLA5
TLqunCoSNjsZCowWdMZBvP8=
=fiz9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-9sbhVLDjC6fafVfnSjJi--