Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:18:06 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>
Cc:        Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: best archiver? (for music)
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903150516360.38979@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org>
References:  <20090313191520.GA14233@thought.org> <20090313202226.GA47453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903132128460.33043@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org> <20090314072602.GA75036@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> 	listened-to (kttsd) the man lame.  Then surfed around; then came
> 	back to the man page and read the several examples.  So: the idea
> 	is that lame ["just"] converts WAV files to mp3.  There is a

as every good unix tool - it does exactly what is supposed to do.

nobody forbids you to make your script that do what you want with lame and 
say cdda2wav

> 	Given the availability of compression these days, it makes me
> 	wonder why telephone conversations still sound so 'tinny'.  But
> 	then, that's another matter.
>
with right configured speex codec phone talks sounds actually better than 
uncompressed :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903150516360.38979>