Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 18:49:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247686] [NEW PORT] devel/py-class-registry: Factory+Registry pattern for Python classes Message-ID: <bug-247686-7788-XPTnOyqSGY@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-247686-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-247686-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247686 Henry <PopularMoment@protonmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |PopularMoment@protonmail.co | |m --- Comment #3 from Henry <PopularMoment@protonmail.com> --- This should probably be called py-class-registry2 as there are 2.x [1] and a 3.x [3] branches from the same project [3] but it's incompatible with at le= ast B2 [4], which is the initial use case. Also note the 3.x branch dropped 2.7 support. [1] https://pypi.org/project/class-registry/ [2] https://pypi.org/project/phx-class-registry/ [3] https://github.com/todofixthis/class-registry/tags [4] https://github.com/Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool/blob/49a29b6d786e68db58ff= 8303c718fdab9d43eaaa/requirements.txt#L4 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-247686-7788-XPTnOyqSGY>