From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 28 3:11: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8B237B422; Mon, 28 May 2001 03:10:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Received: from DougBarton.net (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA54368; Mon, 28 May 2001 03:09:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Message-ID: <3B1223DB.D6D4F2E7@DougBarton.net> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 03:09:31 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/windowmaker Makefile distinfo pkg-plistports/x11-wm/windowmaker/files patch-am patch-wsetfont References: <200105271531.f4RFV6u31074@freefall.freebsd.org> <3B120575.AC6CBC72@DougBarton.net> <3B121EC3.C319ED27@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > This is probably a good way to go with this, but the wmicons port has > > severe fetch'ing problems. None of the first several files could be found > > on any of the master sites, they all had to be fetched from > > ftp.freebsd.org. Given the long connection time outs and delays I finally > > gave up and deleted all the master sites from the Makefile so I'm not sure > > about the rest of the stuff. > > Ok, I'll look into this problem. Cool, thanks. > > > 3. due to (1) bump PORTREVISION. > > > > (Once again,) I really think we need to be more conservative with bumping > > this. The end result of what you get with this change is exactly the same, > > with the addition of a few new icons. IMO that doesn't amount to a change > > in functionality, so it doesn't deserve to be bumped. > > You are not quite correct. As my message clearly indicates, PORTREVISION was bumped not due to icons, > but due to two additional patches backported from i18n version of the port. Yes, I saw that, however at best those two patches slightly improve the install, they don't actually produce any functional changes I could see. Of course, the way this week has been I'm probably missing something. Perhaps you could enlighten me? -- I need someone really bad. Are you really bad? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message