Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:11:45 +0200 (MEST) From: "Michael C. Vergallen" <mvergall@double-barrel.be> To: Greg Quinlan <greg@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux not FreeBSD? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990615140756.479A-100000@ws3.double-barrel.be> In-Reply-To: <025d01beb725$37acd860$380051c2@qmpgmc.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Greg Quinlan wrote: > Hi all, > > This might give people a little bit of a laugh (not really for this forum): > > Here is SCO (the Serious Commercial Organisation of the free software > rip-offs merchants) Saying they are adding Linux compatibility.... well, > well... could not be bothered doing their own thing anymore with free > software source and decided to do some alignment with free software > developers, and OS's so it wil make their product more attractive > > But why Linux and not FreeBSD also? Because FreeBSD dous not have the volume of users Linux apparently has. Now to be serious it does not realy matter because Linux Binaries run under FreeBSD so the apps from SCO should run on FreeBSD anyway. Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.96.990615140756.479A-100000>