From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 26 07:58:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61EA106566B for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9668FC15 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5Q7wXDL033111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:58:34 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5Q7wXDL033111 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1340697514; bh=d7LN+0pEnfF+1dujwfsKicMe6CDKOEuq4L1UaEJdUlc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=XTU2e1JG0OtUAuL/oI0DKmCkHLXvXAAI7ocxhmXcTJECLfpUsLbutf5Gr+708WXkN 7oBdB+WDyhSTVwKOSyODo/utjQsOW/XMYX134LFO1tT6Gq+70Aj31eTYYjEGersQ9F C+1mwvKdWfSPD1NJ24GYcx3Iq/OYcy5QSonFn9G8= Message-ID: <4FE96BA0.6040005@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:58:24 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FE8E4A4.9070507@gmail.com> <20120626065732.GH41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu> In-Reply-To: <20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig99D3B3C59E5EFFBCAE99E926" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Port system "problems" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:58:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig99D3B3C59E5EFFBCAE99E926 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/06/2012 08:26, Marcus von Appen wrote: >>> 1. Ports are not modular >> What do you mean by modular? if you are speaking about subpackages it >> is coming, >> but it takes time > I hope, we are not talking about some Debian-like approach here (foo-bi= n, > foo-dev, foo-doc, ....). Actually, yes -- that's pretty much exactly what we're talking about here. Why do you feel subpackages would be a bad thing? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig99D3B3C59E5EFFBCAE99E926 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/pa6kACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxUsQCfZGvoNLUvompC9K9qW4KqPUFF WO0An2uXQiKlpDEd+RLbhL1bBU75C1HG =h13G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig99D3B3C59E5EFFBCAE99E926--