From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 11 23:03:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFC0106564A for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA048FC16 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id CAA04071; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:03:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1P5ROZ-000LOL-Kh; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:03:03 +0300 Message-ID: <4CB397A7.9040404@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:03:03 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100918 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Smith References: <4CADF96D.8040908@freebsd.org> <4CB21C59.704@freebsd.org> <20101011140319.Q2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20101011140319.Q2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi_ec: request for review and testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:03:17 -0000 on 11/10/2010 06:18 Ian Smith said the following: > On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 10/10/2010 22:29 kuba guzik said the following: > > > I think you should remeber my problem with acpi and battery, well this > > > patch has solved it :) > > > If you want some additional config files just write which one, becouse > > > as you know i'm new user. > > > > Thank you very much for testing! > > Glad that it helped. > > I'll start planning for a commit and MFC. > > I had a go, but the patch doesn't (fully) apply to 8-STABLE. I notice > there's been other work done to acpi_ec in the 5 months since the last > MFC, and I thought it unlikely that the version in HEAD to which your > patch applies could be brought in stand-alone. I'll certainly check > that there's no regression on my Thinkpad T23 when it is MFC'd. I've just done couple of MFCs to stable/8 and the patch should now apply cleanly. I will appreciate your testing. Thanks! -- Andriy Gapon