From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 21 08:58:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA05106564A for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA6F8FC12 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so18730611iah.13 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 01:58:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K2bqYMPbuIFcL5KKdjUFlPn1LQLj77rGLoLVhIag750=; b=rpY9cExkl/+UICRASN8SaOe4D3yGCyK9Pg2Vqo1LGmro+nOE0yp69sMzP8MoaA16Cr t8UcD0KotbwD7IKRMex929A6tH/aTPkI05W+IjYbi9/5GOmJadUR9sTB50XZF0T0NTA3 6/t1sQZ+vWYdlwF4xrvp13fCx51LJavLB30E7Br9pEe0ni/4tk1BYCBB7XlvrYhDS3MI o2o5H5Fu4ryNyNOAfuYmkdHqo+HURZBRhbEtYknUtT96MpFJjIOXsCpS75iAUVbJWjBs QFcVv3TamAxqQEDJuGu0cxiOBXyTeOO2NcAWbKITO2KaPiUQVwB6h0wqfiUD7bAXSQGV 971g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.191.200 with SMTP id ha8mr1289902igc.45.1334998701846; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 01:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com Received: by 10.43.130.201 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 01:58:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120420185543.GU2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20120420185543.GU2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:58:21 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Sk6vl-ZgL9hUURK_WTJt9PecgaE Message-ID: From: Robert Millan To: Konstantin Belousov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Increase DFLDSIZ on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:58:22 -0000 El 20 d=E2=80=99abril de 2012 20:55, Konstantin Belousov ha escrit: > Just for record, this is not an issue with dynamic linker. > Kernel image activator returns error if data segment size is larger > then RLIMIT_DATA value, see imgact_elf.c:901. I see. So if it can't be handled gracefully in userland, the more reason to avoid it... Is there any objection to increasing DFLDSIZ as proposed? --=20 Robert Millan