Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:25:22 +0100
From:      Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>
To:        Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc:        Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Increasing the DMESG buffer....
Message-ID:  <50AD0E82.3070706@digiware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20121122040251.G21191@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References:  <50ACA59D.3080809@digiware.nl> <20121121101411.GG4535@server.rulingia.com> <50ACD522.7000706@digiware.nl> <50ACEE5B.8000901@FreeBSD.org> <50ACF891.4050105@digiware.nl> <1353513692.69940.7.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50ACFC6C.8070506@FreeBSD.org> <20121122040251.G21191@sola.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-11-21 18:09, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:08:12 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>  > on 21/11/2012 18:01 Ian Lepore said the following:
>  > > You know what would be great?  Have this value auto-tune itself upwards
>  > > if bootverbose is true.
>  > 
>  > This sounds /potentially/ neat.
>  > 
>  > > The sound drivers now spit out so much stuff
>  > > with bootverbose true that you need like a 128k buffer to see the early
>  > > boot messages.
>  > 
>  > I'd argue that snd_hda should not do that.  It should use a different knob.
> 
> If I had a +1 I'd spend it on this one.  Great when you need it, but ..

Why bother...
Memory is so cheap these days. We're talking about 64Kb being "wasted".
On average I would assume that there is more than this wasted in odd
bits and pieces in the kernel.

--WjW





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50AD0E82.3070706>