Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:57:41 +0200
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
To:        Volker Stolz <vs@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: An idea about forbidden ports
Message-ID:  <20051026095741.GB45036@isis.sigpipe.cz>
In-Reply-To: <djnff3$4vc$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <20051025002406.M911@odysseus.silby.com> <20051025171824.GC33303@xor.obsecurity.org> <djnff3$4vc$1@sea.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# vs@FreeBSD.org / 2005-10-26 08:41:08 +0000:
> * Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>:
> > That's not a bad idea.  Can someone come up with an implementation?
> 
> I thought a bit about generating an empty package with a 'pkg-req'-script
> displaying the message...That wouldn't require any updates in the
> pkg-tools-chain.

    Except it'll break portinstall -P. ftp ls will be no good anymore.
    There's probably more.

    Instead of breaking user expectations, make pkg_add -r print
    
    "If you're sure you've got the package name right then this means
    that the package is not available for your platform/os version
    combination. Bla bla bla."

    and be done with it.

-- 
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man.  You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE.             http://bash.org/?255991



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051026095741.GB45036>