From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 19:00:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4707116A4CE for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:00:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (sbk-gw.sibnet.ru [217.70.96.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4788443D31 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:00:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2M3079S001041; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:00:08 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from localhost (stranger@localhost)i2M306BQ001038; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:00:07 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: sbk-gw.sibnet.ru: stranger owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:00:04 +0600 (NOVT) From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" X-X-Sender: stranger@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru To: Juan Rodriguez Hervella In-Reply-To: <200403161054.31153.jfrherve@ing.uc3m.es> Message-ID: <20040322085810.F762@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> References: <20040315175559.GG755@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <200403161054.31153.jfrherve@ing.uc3m.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_01 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on sbk-gw.sibnet.ru cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: doscmd removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:00:19 -0000 I don't think that fuctionality you need is much dependent whether it's ports or whether it's base. I vote for ports just because we have some platforms that is unsupported by doscmd. Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek mailto:stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru mailto:stranger@fpm.ami.nstu.ru On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote: >On Monday 15 March 2004 18:55, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:53:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: >> > Mark Linimon writes: >> > > So, you'll be submitting the patches to install it to the ports >> > > tree, then? >> > >> > Yes. >> >> Excellent. I use doscmd for certain things such as running flash and >> BIOS related tools. I'd be happy to see it 'bumped down' to ports status. >> > >I think doscmd works very well, I've been playing with it a couple of >days, and its great. > >The pity is that it doesn't have support for int13, which is used by >most of the old MS_DOS games (like Prince of Persia, my favourite). > >If it's going to be well mantained, I would prefer to see it on the ports >collection, but on the other hand I wouldn't like to see >this program dissapear from FreeBSD at all. > >I've never tested it with flash utilities and such (Im afraid of upgrading >my flash :), but I think it is a useful thing to have, either on the base >system or in the ports. > >Regards. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >