Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:06:57 +0200
From:      Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE and 11.2-RELEASE images fail to boot on BeagleBone Black
Message-ID:  <20190715200657.17c4e2b933abebfb11047e6e@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190714174432.GC26897@lonesome.com>
References:  <8352f841-0522-9f45-148d-d2948e97857e@gmail.com> <20190713152404.GJ1503@dendrobates> <b6876ce7-5147-5f1a-d712-3515e124cd36@gmail.com> <6b3dcec02b425a8559605b4e6c5ada19ee642728.camel@freebsd.org> <20190713194256.GK1503@dendrobates> <85e35455-793a-84fe-c8cf-39b89ade7c11@gmail.com> <900bc3467c7e28f58e8e6cf17e881bdefcb3b751.camel@freebsd.org> <20190714174432.GC26897@lonesome.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 17:44:32 +0000
Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 10:04:30AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > That's why I've talked several times in terms of "weekly snapshots" and
> > "12-STABLE" which is NOT 12-RELEASE.
> 
> Although the FreeBSD FAQ is old, stinky, and rotten, this part is still
> valid:
> 
>   https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.html#idp42812792
> 
> > Two or three years ago it looked like arm was at the point where it
> > should be a tier-1 platform, and I put a lot of effort into things like
> > testing releases, because releases that actually work seem like an
> > important thing for a tier-1 platform. 
> 
> I will have to admit ignorance of the past history, so I can't address
> what went wrong there.
> 
> But my own view as a very casual user of arm is this:
> 
>  - we need more people doing testing (both releases and snapshots), and
>    reporting the results.
> 
>  - we need to be better about gathering that information together.
> 
> IMHO it's impossible (and even if possible, unfair), to expect one person
> to test N arm boards.  

 I did test almost every image for 11.0 (I think that GUMSTIX was the
only one I haven't tested) so it's possible but the fact that I didn't
for 12.0 says a lot :)

> Also IMHO, the information in the wiki is only as
> good as the people who contribute to it make it.
> 
> I think I can offer the following page(s) as a proof that we (the FreeBSD
> community) *can* do this right, if we put our minds to it:
> 
>   https://wiki.freebsd.org/Laptops
> 
> Dozens of people have contributed to this page and its sub-pages over
> the years.
> 
> If enough people are interested, I can put together a page modeled on
> this, and we can see where it goes from there.
> 
> mcl
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190715200657.17c4e2b933abebfb11047e6e>