From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 1 21:27:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C9716A41C; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:27:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C860243D1F; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:27:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j61LYfkP089260; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:34:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42C5B531.9040202@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:27:13 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Zbyslaw References: <200506290818.j5T8IELL002348@peedub.jennejohn.org> <42C3F72E.9070902@speakeasy.net> <8f55402905063018441217c95a@mail.gmail.com> <20050701015457.GC4460@dragon.NUXI.org> <42C5220B.1000203@crossflight.co.uk> <1d6d20bc050701065367a01e8b@mail.gmail.com> <20050701172139.GA25916@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <42C587EC.7030203@samsco.org> <42C5B396.9000500@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <42C5B396.9000500@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 X2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:27:27 -0000 Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >> The Asus A8V-E series also does not work. Asus claims that it's a >> limitation of the Via K8T890 chipset, which is highly unfortunate >> since it's otherwise a good motherboard. Not sure whether to be >> upset at Asus or Via here, but either way I guess both suck =-) > > > Off topic a bit, but what would be your criteria for judging it a good > motherboard? > > --Alex > 1) Boots FreeBSD 2) Has a COM1 header 3) Has good perihperals (this one even has wifi built in, though there is no driver yet). Scott