From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 28 18:45:06 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB8B1065670;
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net)
Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2001:470:9a47::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1718FC08;
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:45:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (localhost.spoerlein.net [IPv6:::1])
	by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9SIj4uE062791
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=spoerlein.net;
	s=dkim200908; t=1288291504;
	bh=YR++qhfKaVV5rDaztlG3V6niAj3fJPkAi+QikjL95jQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To;
	b=H9hGhaMXggnd41Gl+NY+z0duviloBXjc5CW4h8TIJ/U+YkAzr9e4SoKkdPP3Kpexc
	H2oFTLfYPHx9HPnIH0+9vyqt6Dsfyt1NDPGjFFwTNildAeDzWK33gx2HuerKWoT90k
	16q68OQwaopc1VTwgRkWLAGCVv9npWpnhuSkiCbQ=
Received: (from uqs@localhost)
	by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o9SIj47a062790;
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:45:04 +0200
From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@spoerlein.net>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20101028184504.GB46314@acme.spoerlein.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
References: <ia4qnl$bgl$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20101025211904.GM2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20101026205801.GA39716@zim.MIT.EDU>
	<D1BAEBBF-4CD4-4C2A-A877-B86D6322E6C7@samsco.org>
	<AANLkTikR2YuLA-SGc2HKNp94BEBFF0+hO2ye-=qJVnwD@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CC92D1B.5010701@entel.upc.edu>
	<AANLkTimVWaRzhuCDHM-F_+yYNF9ObqViPSzQ51M0wQRA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimVWaRzhuCDHM-F_+yYNF9ObqViPSzQ51M0wQRA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Importing the fusefs kernel module?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:45:06 -0000

On Thu, 28.10.2010 at 12:19:52 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2010/10/28 Gustau Pérez <gperez@entel.upc.edu>:
> 
> >   The point is, do we stick with fuse or do we switch to puffs ? What is
> 
> Basically my vote goes to fuse for these reasons:
> 
>  * More file systems are developed for fuse
>  * It's more popular both among the users and 3d party software
> developers (you mentioned Gnome)
>  * It's better performing, at least in theory, because puffs was not
> originally written for a multi-threaded kernel (lots of serialization)

I was under the impression, there's a library for puffs (called
re-fuse?!?) which would provide API compatible shims for FUSE, rendering
your first argument invalid.

Or am I wrong?

Uli