From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org  Thu Aug  4 16:14:37 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC329BAFE36
 for <freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  4 Aug 2016 16:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8560E18F8;
 Thu,  4 Aug 2016 16:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-226-8.lns20.per1.internode.on.net
 [121.45.226.8]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u74GEVTR001907
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?
To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>,
 Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org>
 <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org>
 <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org>
 <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org>
 <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org>
 <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org>
 <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>
 <ee745842-c33e-4e73-f84c-6eb11f283b51@FreeBSD.org>
 <a3e98e25-4c0d-56ad-5640-0b6f13ebeb21@freebsd.org>
 <428538212.20160804132737@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>
From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <c0d84ec4-a34b-905f-b0c0-97c79a69f99c@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 00:14:26 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <428538212.20160804132737@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 16:14:37 -0000

On 4/08/2016 6:27 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Julian,
>
> Thursday, August 4, 2016, 6:42:45 AM, you wrote:
>
>> A combination is less useful for me as you need to do:
>    I'm against this too, as I really love orthogonality, as everybody know
>   already, and your example is good example why.
>
>> 20 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup record-state
>> 21 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup
>> to make the entire session do the same thing.
>   Sometimes it could be
>
> 20 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup record-state
> 21 check-state
>
>   But only sometimes.

exactly.. I don't want OTHER packets coming past here to hit a 
check-state yet.. I still have unfinished business with them.

>