From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 26 07:49:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185441065674; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1FE8FC1A; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so1940573iwn.13 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:49:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.218.134 with SMTP id hq6mr1873491icb.289.1298705104301; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.119] (99-74-169-43.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.74.169.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wt14sm1096803icb.4.2011.02.25.23.25.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:25:03 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tim Kientzle X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <317BD8618FA7450ABC86001948F4DFE4@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:25:00 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <98FE1AB5-5276-4B12-A034-106330EBB713@kientzle.com> References: <8CDA335A0CABF7E-338-9FC4@web-mmc-d05.sysops.aol.com> <317BD8618FA7450ABC86001948F4DFE4@multiplay.co.uk> To: Steven Hartland X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: quotas an essential feature? (was: svn commit: r218953 - stable/8/usr.sbin/sysinstall) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:49:31 -0000 On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: > While I can understand some may want its not something we use on any of > our machines, and I suspect that's the case for many others. > > Given adding it means the kernel will be doing extra work and hence a > drop in performance... Does anyone have benchmark results to measure the performance hit? Tim