Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:28:57 -0400 From: Paul Khavkine <paul@colba.net> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Name service switch Message-ID: <3D3EB9A8.E0B2977E@colba.net> References: <20020723215150.F224D3807@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well the one we have in -CURRENT lacks dynamic module support (as does IRS). I just wanted to know if there was any issues for not implementing IRS before ? Thanx Paul Peter Wemm wrote: > Paul Khavkine wrote: > > Hi folks. > > Since FreeBSD currently lacks a fully functional NSS implementation why > > dont we use IRS from BIND ? > > Is there any problems with that ? > > We already have NSS in 5.x, which is just as functional as IRS. > > Cheers, > -Peter > -- > Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com > "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D3EB9A8.E0B2977E>