From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 12:48:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A449E260; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1600B229D; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id f8so3302280wiw.6 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 05:48:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IuCYKR6SMCeY4Lh5amYxmHQlbjVWp8+mmIdtCGLRNKk=; b=AFyIZUCg14AGIokAt6FUfUhMSvHfABtjyFIwrFKNoswaz0Aiz5VxkXL95NrW0edNgm JdFiPuoDc9d3piu377AbYKNDeG2ELhARDxX4UjX7zUKtFBboVvtAqbRXoJQltJZqtIo7 tF/10iPNc8Aos3V5HLNTWdspEBWWfkGFRvuFCvzwJr/MMexqsA+9KpTOG/k0qvI+zDAs HDazJJsa+ERXP11+6SAcnv7IytcVX+cMpu+qdntN4Od9On/AER9Jl1ZcMW6aAH22Gynv /TEEf4tjzYVYH9KBC5UO1kam2XjniQw53XGHzLAtGf4HqG8lyDg0DgJbrrI/k2bjVjQo aLRg== X-Received: by 10.180.72.43 with SMTP id a11mr5433848wiv.21.1405428503435; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 05:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm43452117wib.14.2014.07.15.05.48.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 05:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:48:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Ladan Subject: Re: marking vulnerable ports forbidden? Message-ID: <20140715124819.GU93051@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3pZQ0wszfDg7ZRO+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:48:25 -0000 --3pZQ0wszfDg7ZRO+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:45:19PM +0200, Ren=E9 Ladan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > according to Freshports [1] there are currently 24 vulnerable ports not > marked as forbidden. > How about checking this list on a regular basis and marking such ports and > forbidden and optionally as deprecated? This would inform users not using > vuxml earlier about vulnerabilities. >=20 > [1] http://www.freshports.org/ports-vulnerable.php Please mark them as forbidden regards, Bapt --3pZQ0wszfDg7ZRO+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPFIxMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyksQCfWCmCQl5UT0fKolK+80SQRDRF bkgAoKxQldtw/IrjmWuQBQQIwLjT9GJP =A4CX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3pZQ0wszfDg7ZRO+--