Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 14:10:36 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: dstenn@fanfic.org, FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: jpeg shared libraries Was: enlightenment-0.13.3 Message-ID: <354DB03C.1B2FBB7D@partitur.se> References: <199805040118.SAA01588@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami wrote: > > * | +JPEG_LIB_VERSION=80 > > * I've made the change and is currently recompiling jpeg. I'll keep you > * posted. > > For the umpteenth time: DO NOT MAKE THIS CHANGE. Whoever keeps > posting this bogus solution, please stop. This is HARMFUL. > > Please try the latest jpeg port or package (preferred), and get back > if that doesn't fix it for you. > > Satoshi (who really hates all CAPS but can't help) > > P.S. If you already made this change and recompiled jpeg, you need to > delete the shared library (libjpeg.so.80.0 in /usr/local/lib) by hand. OK, I won't! :-/ Sorry, but I don't get it: jpeglib.h /* Version ID for the JPEG library. * Might be useful for tests like "#if JPEG_LIB_VERSION >= 60". */ #define JPEG_LIB_VERSION 62 /* Version 6b */ This is what the patch changes (62 becomes 8, and 8 < 62, so the test in the commment won't work anymore, and ports like xemacs failed for me). I sent in a comment via GNATS (6357) and got the (false?) impression that this was committed. I don't have a /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.80.0, neither do I have libjpeg.so.62.0 I dont't get. Please explain. :) /Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?354DB03C.1B2FBB7D>