Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 00:02:58 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: freebsd-questions Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 4TB filesystem Message-ID: <B033157D-550E-49AA-8449-DEB49E774D08@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <20060807055126.GA27084@sysadm.stc> References: <44D14C43.10957.1C8B605A@rabing.omc.net> <20060803001240.41813.qmail@web34508.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <72cf361e0608051235n5c0e70fobc6f6caad8eeec69@mail.gmail.com> <20060807055126.GA27084@sysadm.stc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:51 PM, Igor Robul wrote: > On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote: >> Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and >> unclean umount..... > Background fsck does not work well with big filesystems, it can > literaly > make server useless for long period of time, sometimes I just boot > server in single user mode and do "fsck -y" because while it means > downtime, but after this downtime server will work ... while > background > fsck eats all server memory and most of CPU. > > I'm very happy, that I dont need do this often :-) > If I remember the postings or news from a while back right, someone is porting ZFS from OpenSolaris to FreeBSD(?). I will be glad when this happens. I have been playing with ZFS on a Solaris machine and it is majorly cool. Goodbye fsck and Hello ease of use and performance. <http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/intro/>; Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B033157D-550E-49AA-8449-DEB49E774D08>