Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:14:37 +0300 From: "Niki Denev" <nike_d@cytexbg.com> To: "Max Laier" <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface Message-ID: <2e77fc10805211514q59dd0eadkac2edce50d6c22f7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200805212332.13993.max@love2party.net> References: <2e77fc10805211031n6c42ffd2u3dee28164094b83b@mail.gmail.com> <200805212305.58235.max@love2party.net> <2e77fc10805211422q75603d54h5709ed3e5be37d0a@mail.gmail.com> <200805212332.13993.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote: > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 23:22:52 Niki Denev wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote: >> > Looks good, though I'd probably move up the _INVOKE to before the >> > ARPs are sent out. Probably between twiddling the hardware and >> > sending ARPs (though that needs an else-case if the interface is > ^------------------------------------------------- >> > still down). In fact the ARPs could be sent from an event hook, too. > ---------^ >> > This would get rid of INET specific code in the LL-interface code. >> >> I thought about moving it up too, but in this case isn't it going to >> be called only if the interface is up (IFF_UP)? > > See above. > Oh, I've missed that. So, generating ARPs from an event handler looks to like the best solution. But in that case what would be the correct place for it? if_ethersubr.c and the others (fw,fddi,arc...) that may use ARP? Niki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2e77fc10805211514q59dd0eadkac2edce50d6c22f7>