Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 21:52:10 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: John <warendaj@home.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Not so much a question ... Message-ID: <20010107215210.F95729@rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexco> In-Reply-To: <000501c07930$a90bfc60$4500a8c0@bens1.pa.home.com>; from warendaj@home.com on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:05:45AM -0500 References: <000501c07930$a90bfc60$4500a8c0@bens1.pa.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:05:45AM -0500, John wrote: [snip] > While I realize it's completely logical .. the process by which this all > took place .. I have to ask honestly how many of us would have sifted > through the Makefile to look for dependancies ... and then through those > Makefile's for their dependancies ... and so on? Especially when the > assumption is that the program being installed is relatively minor. $ make all-depends-list > What I'd like to know is firstly, is there any clean way to back out of > an ongoing install like this and if not, why? If nothing has been installed, you can just stop and do a 'make distclean' to kill all the work. If anything has been installed recently, $ ls -lrt /var/db/pkg And 'pkg_delete' the recent installs related to this port. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010107215210.F95729>