Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:08:51 -0800 From: perikillo <perikillo@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bacula vs. Amanda vs. whatever ... Message-ID: <51d7a5160512100008q114d9ba4k786d6ae202b748ea@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512090221.jB92LUNV013191@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <000a01c60cb3$8aac6130$2401a8c0@XGISH> <20051208224447.GA23802@mach.bobleeit.net> <200512090221.jB92LUNV013191@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/8/05, Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> wrote: > > I have a home network with two FreeBSD servers (web- and file-server), = a =3D > > number of Windows desktops and a wireless FreeBSD laptop all connected = to o=3D > > ne another using Samba.=3D20 > > Advantage of Amanda, if I understand well, is that you don't need to > install anything on your Windows machines. > > I have been using Amanda to backup various Unixes and Windows for > years now and it is very satisfactory. > > I even wrote some web interface so that Windows user could add some > shares to back-up, without any sys admin help. OK that bit has not > been tested with XP... > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > This information is very important, but you only say windows, but i like to know wich one...? All...? Because i want to try bacula+mysql-5 to backup 1 win2k3, 2 WinNT4 and 1 Linux box. I try once bacula on freebsd 5.4-p8 with bacula using some simple tape drive and backup the win2k3 box and it works, but my doubt is winNT4+Linux, you have some winNT4+Linux on your list with bacula or amanda...? Greetings!!!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51d7a5160512100008q114d9ba4k786d6ae202b748ea>