Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 18:40:58 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RELENG_5: ata interrupt problems Message-ID: <4128CC9A.5070806@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <16680.50768.986606.329420@ran.psg.com> References: <200408191632.25637.kent.hauser@verizon.net> <20040820085322.GC16420@eddie.nitro.dk> <20040821130814.GA2795@arthur.nitro.dk> <16679.63728.806424.628485@ran.psg.com> <41289139.6060806@DeepCore.dk> <16680.50768.986606.329420@ran.psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Randy Bush wrote: >>Since I have a few confirmations that backstepping just ATA doesnt help= =20 >>at all, I'm not convinced this is an ATA problem, at least not in the=20 >>sense that changes to ATA broke it. >=20 >=20 > after some decades in swdev, i am never sure of anything until > i find the cause. and, even then, i am suspicious. :-) Geesh we are alot of oldtimers in here :) and yes there is always just=20 one more bug... Anyhow I committed a fix for the fake slave problem, now we still have=20 those "taskqueue stalled" complaints that I'm still scratching my head=20 about and that backstepping ATA doesn't solve... -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4128CC9A.5070806>