From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Oct 28 5:57:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F95414C21 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 05:57:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA26795 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:57:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA32616 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:57:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 608) id 8F93C14C21; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 05:57:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" To: julian@whistle.com Cc: peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Julian Elischer on Thu, 28 Oct 1999 02:33:22 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: Storing small files in inodes Message-Id: <19991028125736.8F93C14C21@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 05:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG storing small files in the inode solves the .file problem. during his second tutorial at FreeBSDCon, kirk spoke of trying to combine the .files into a single file.....went over like a lead balloon at the time. sounds like a good idea to me. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message