From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 20:50:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40D71065674 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D3A8FC1C for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5QKo3GV083474 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m5QKo3YM083473; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200806262050.m5QKo3YM083473@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: falz Cc: Subject: Re: ports/125022: www/rt36 - upgrade RT to latest (3.6.7) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: falz List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:50:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/125022; it has been noted by GNATS. From: falz To: "Vivek Khera" Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/125022: www/rt36 - upgrade RT to latest (3.6.7) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:44:05 -0500 On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Vivek Khera wrote: > Thanks! > > Did you test it with "make clean" to see if any files were missing or left > behind? This was done. In fact, the diff to create the patch was made from a directory structure that did have 'work' in it and was installed from a few times, and cleaned up only using 'make clean'. > I won't be able to get to that for a couple of days, but that's my only > concern with your patch. If it passes cleanly with make clean leaving > nothing behind, I'm all for committing this. Sounds good. The reason I submitted the patch was simply because I was about to upgrade from 3.6.5 to 3.6.6, noticed that 3.6.7 was out, and figured I'd rather just upgrade once instead of twice. Note that when creating the patch, my only concern is that the old way of checking for the 3 updated dependencies would hit patches installed from cpan/bsdpan. The new way may force them to be installed from via ports, which shouldn't hurt anything/may be a good thing. --falz