Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:54:58 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Mark Dixon <mnd999@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, rodrigo@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port for Maven 3.3 Message-ID: <20151021125458.GM19913@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <3010313.TBdmNM2Oy9@mark-thinkpad-x1-carbon> References: <1627508.KhBpB2Vanr@mark-thinkpad-x1-carbon> <20151021121622.GL19913@home.opsec.eu> <3010313.TBdmNM2Oy9@mark-thinkpad-x1-carbon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > Agreed, it sounds like we need a decision on whether we want > > devel/maven3 > devel/maven31 > devel/maven33 etc. > > or > > devel/maven Yes. I'm no real maven user, so I can't contribute experience. The choice should be based on experience and probably some testing, if the dependent ports still build and run with the grand unified maven (which would be 3.3.x). > >From that ticket, there isn't a huge amount that depends on Maven so the > consensus seemed to be for devel/maven. If that is the case I'll cancel my bug > and try to help facilitate that. It would be good to have some goal posts > agreed though, for where we need to get to for someone to be bold and just > commit it. I'm new here though, so I'm not sure how this usually works. We try to do evidence-based computer science 8-), but have not found anyone who had the time/skills to build and run-test the dependent ports listed in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188110#c19 Can you say something about your time-budget ? If you soon find the time to test, I would prefer that. Otherwise, maybe it's just time to jump into the abyss with 3.3.x 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151021125458.GM19913>