Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:12:22 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix-gps Makefile
Message-ID:  <20050102231222.GA85287@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050102225314.GJ63708@k7.mavetju>
References:  <20050102064857.GA4047@frontfree.net> <20050102065949.GB6250@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102070800.GA106@frontfree.net> <20050102071136.GD1436@k7.mavetju> <20050102071849.GA31292@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102112037.GE1436@k7.mavetju> <20050102201818.GA42186@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102213206.GI63708@k7.mavetju> <20050102223941.GA75006@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102225314.GJ63708@k7.mavetju>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:53:14AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 02:39:41PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:32:06AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:18:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:20:37PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > >=20
> > > > > > The problem is that INDEX builds also need to set this or the
> > > > > > dependency list will be all wrong.  Doing this the obvious way =
gives a
> > > > > > huge slowdown.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > What are the obvious ways? This is what I made in a galaxy far far
> > > > > away when I still had the hope I could change the world. What is
> > > > > does is when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined it sets the default WITH_
> > > > > and WITHOUT_ values are being set.
> > > >=20
> > > > And that gives a huge slowdown, because of all the extra make/shell
> > > > gunk that is processed 12000 times :)
> > >=20
> > > I couldn't find a single shell command in this.
> >=20
> > OK (I might have been confusing it with the slowdown that happened
> > along with a previously-committed OPTIONS-related change) but did you
> > benchmark it?
>=20
> I would like to, but at this moment I'm not sure what and how:

index builds, as mentioned above.  Make sure to do it on a quiet
system, run each test twice and discard the first measurement due to
caching effects.

Kris
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFB2H/WWry0BWjoQKURAq2iAJwNIt0H0wcIqVwNy2WvpxhS3sGnKwCfcMaq
FrUFPFRkuM5tuOr5thz51JE=
=j6FG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050102231222.GA85287>