From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 00:44:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDF316A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay15-f40.bay15.hotmail.com [65.54.185.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E176543D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:44:56 -0700 Received: from 211.30.218.106 by by15fd.bay15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [211.30.218.106] X-Originating-Email: [iain_dooley@hotmail.com] X-Sender: iain_dooley@hotmail.com From: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:44:56 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56.0817 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7E71E10:01C45BDF] Subject: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:57 -0000 I am running FreeBSD-STABLE (4.10) and have been using ports/pkg_add/portupgrade/cvsup to stay current with most programs. however there are two things that i'm having trouble with, and i'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction: 1) i received a small patch for Kate (K Advanced Text Editor) from one of the developers, how can i compile this new code into the binary? 2) this question may be answered by any information provided in answer to my first question, but how can i upgrade specific components of KDE (such as Kate) without upgrading the entire KDE installation (which takes a couple of days) and lastly, a quality of life question: 3) Is it safe to do a portupgrade of KDE whilst KDE is still running? thanks very much, Iain Dooley _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 01:32:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5E516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:32:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (fed1rmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.241.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6878743D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Received: from reichlieu.lan ([68.6.195.68]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040627013211.MDUR26142.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@reichlieu.lan>; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:32:11 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reichlieu.lan (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5R1WCFm047017; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 18:32:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Message-ID: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 18:32:12 -0700 From: Matt Navarre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Iain Dooley References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Scanned: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:32:13 -0000 Iain Dooley wrote: > I am running FreeBSD-STABLE (4.10) and have been using > ports/pkg_add/portupgrade/cvsup to stay current with most programs. > however there are two things that i'm having trouble with, and i'm > hoping someone can point me in the right direction: > > 1) i received a small patch for Kate (K Advanced Text Editor) from one > of the developers, how can i compile this new code into the binary? You could run make extract from whichever kde* port Kate is installed from (kdebase, I think), cd into the work directory, apply the patch, and then run make install clean as normal. It should work if the patch applies cleanly. I think you can also put the patch in the files directory (in the port's dir), and give it the right naming convention and the ports magic will apply it. See the Porters Handbook for more info. It would be cool if there was an easy way to apply a local hack to a port auto-magicaly. > > 2) this question may be answered by any information provided in answer > to my first question, but how can i upgrade specific components of KDE > (such as Kate) without upgrading the entire KDE installation (which > takes a couple of days) , Wish I knew. It would be nice if KDE packaged stuff in smaller chunks than they do, but.... > > > and lastly, a quality of life question: > > 3) Is it safe to do a portupgrade of KDE whilst KDE is still running? I've had mixed results doing this, usually it works fine, but sometimes I've gotten anything from random crashy baddness to weird configuration glitches. I've taken to either killing X and upgrading KDE or changing .xinitrc to start FVWM and rebuild KDE. I usually go with killing X if I know the portupgrade -R is going to end up rebuilding X with everything else. It'll *probably* work fine without being paranoid, but why tempt fate? > > thanks very much, > > Iain Dooley > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 02:19:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC21216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:19:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EA9F43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:19:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 43502 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Jun 2004 02:18:41 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:18:41 +0200 From: Michal Pasternak To: David O'Brien , Remi , questions@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040627021841.GC43456@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:19:28 -0000 David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]: > You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, > right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 > 2.8GHz running the same OS. ... but will it outperform it also by heat dissipation? -- m From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 02:29:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:29:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD8743D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) Received: from dhcp13.home.jcdurham.com (18.gibs5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.184.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5R2SeBK068320; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:28:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) From: Jim Durham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:28:34 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040626143912.24ea4d67.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> In-Reply-To: <20040626143912.24ea4d67.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406262228.34997.durham@jcdurham.com> cc: Robert Storey Subject: Re: Centrino - Made for Microsoft Windows XP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:29:14 -0000 On Saturday 26 June 2004 02:39 am, Robert Storey wrote: > I recently purchased a new laptop, an IBM X31 ThinkPad, which uses the > Centrino processor. I had high expectations for this machine. > > Alas, my expectations have been shattered. All attempts at installing > FreeBSD 5.2.1 quickly end with a crash. Interestingly, I have an old FBSD > 4.8 CD - that installs fine. Lest anybody think my 5.2.1 CDR is bad, I went > and downloaded it a second time, plus I also tried a network install. > Failure every time. > > Nor is the problem limited to FreeBSD. MEPIS Linux crashes during the > install as well. Knoppix Linux installed but dmesg was putting out lots of > error messages (for example, it could not mount a journaled ext3 partition, > so it mounted as ext2). In the end, I got Knoppix to install and run > reliably only by using the older 2.4.26 kernel and by disabling APIC. > > After doing some Googling and seeing that others were having issues, my > suspicion is that Centrino's power management features are to blame. But I > could be wrong. > > So I guess my question is this: Has anybody here gotten FreeBSD 5.2.1 to > install on a Centrino laptop? If so, did you need to do anything special to > make it work? Any tips, tricks or hints I should try? Or should I just wait > for FreeBSD 5.3 to come out and hope it works? Or should I file a PR? > > If others are not having problems with the Centrino chip, I might to back > to IBM and demand that they replace the motherboard, but I tend to think > they'll just tell me to reinstall Windows XP and all will be well. There is > indeed a sticker on the laptop saying "Made for Microsoft Windows XP" > (well, there was, I ripped the sticker off, but I still can't install > FreeBSD). 5.2.1 Here on a Dell Inspiron 600M with Centrino. All OK ACPI-wise. Won't talk to my SCSI Adaptec 1460 card and won't talk to the internal wireless adapter. No special setup on 5.2.1. I had a Dell Inspiron 4000 before and lots of ACPI troubles. I had to select the #2 choice on the boot menu to even boot it. -- -Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 02:48:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFF916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pinky.otenet.gr (pinky.otenet.gr [195.170.0.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FFD43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:48:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a032.otenet.gr [212.205.215.32]) i5R2lkk5013794; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:53 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5R2lYwc003280; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R2lTQq003279; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:29 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Matt Navarre Message-ID: <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> cc: Iain Dooley cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:48:28 -0000 On 2004-06-26 18:32, Matt Navarre wrote: > Iain Dooley wrote: > > > >1) i received a small patch for Kate (K Advanced Text Editor) from > >one of the developers, how can i compile this new code into the binary? > > You could run make extract from whichever kde* port Kate is installed > from (kdebase, I think), cd into the work directory, apply the patch, > and then run make install clean as normal. It should work if the patch > applies cleanly. > > I think you can also put the patch in the files directory (in the > port's dir), and give it the right naming convention and the ports > magic will apply it. See the Porters Handbook for more info. If the patch has been prepared to apply cleanly from the top level directory of the extracted source tree, than putting it in files/patch-zz-local or something like that will let the ports "magic" find it and apply it as part of the port build process. > It would be cool if there was an easy way to apply a local hack to a > port auto-magicaly. There is... just put your patches in files/patch-* files. Make sure that if they are sorted alphabetically, their order is correct, i.e. if you have two patches name them patch-zz-local-1 and patch-zz-local-2 or similar -- this way they will be applied *after* any existing port patches (because of the -zz- part) and local-1 will be applied before local-2 ensuring the order you want to use. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:23:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3392B16A4CE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:23:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E437943D2F; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:23:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5R3N2ji043733; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:53:03 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:53:01 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271253.01432.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -4.9 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Remi cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:23:29 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: > > I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one > > would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be > > easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 > > FreeBSD version? > > You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, > right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 > 2.8GHz running the same OS. A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. =46or raw performance it's "pretty nice" though :) =2D --=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3j2V5ZPcIHs/zowRAoZpAKCnZMb/Kxk9wElcBhktj9NPDPsPggCgh6b2 iasKpu5F998wHLaC5flWA+E=3D =3DQBEE =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:35:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CD416A4D6 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:35:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B8943D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:35:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-240.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.240])i5R3ZLHY026426; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:05:22 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: antenneX , "Giorgos Keramidas" Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:05:21 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <00ce01c45ba0$343ffc00$0200000a@SAGEAME> <20040626184008.GB1016@gothmog.gr> <00da01c45bcb$b1381d70$0200000a@SAGEAME> In-Reply-To: <00da01c45bcb$b1381d70$0200000a@SAGEAME> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271305.21121.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A SED script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:35:52 -0000 On Sunday 27 June 2004 07:49, antenneX wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Giorgos Keramidas" > To: "antenneX" > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 1:40 PM > Subject: Re: A SED script > > > On 2004-06-26 12:08, antenneX wrote: > > > I cannot get it to work on another file (perl.pl file) to change the > > line: > > > $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX060"; to $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX070"; > > > > > > I suspect I'm not handling the quotes or other operators correctly > > and it > > > > just ignores the change. > > > > > > Here's the snippet of the script I'm trying to use: > > > #!/bin/sh > > > new=`grep -i new /path/to/newfile` > > > old=`grep -i new /path/to/oldfile` It would seem that the variables new and old will both be set to something containing 'new' (perhaps not in lower case). How does this relate to "ATX060" and "ATX070"? > > > sed -i.bak -e "s/$old/$new/" /path/to/myfile > > > > The results depend heavily on the existence and contents of the two > > files > > > named /path/to/{old,new}file. I'm sure if you change the sed line to: > > > > sed -i.bak -e 's/ATX060/ATX070/' /path/to/myfile > > > > it will all work fine. > > Indeed, this works fine. The old/new files are needed to set the > varibles to hold the new number for the next time as this is run via > cron. > You've still not shown us the relevant lines of /path/to/newfile or /path/to/oldfile > old = ATX060 > new = ATX070 What are these? The contents of /path/to/{new,old}file? If so sed will be looking to change the string "old = ATX060" to "new = ATX070". Or do the files simply consist of ATX060 and ATX070 ? If so then grep is not the right command to load the variables old and new. Try: new=`cat /path/to/newfile` old=`cat /path/to/oldfile` Malcolm > > ....then, after the script changes the line in the perl script, it needs > to pipe (echo/cat) in the new file contents to the old: > cat newfile > oldfile ---> which is now ATX070 for oldfile > ...then incremement the newfile to become "ATX080" and so on.... > > Now, got to figure out how to increment number up. It is an invoice > prefix number that contains the month # and must modify the perl file > that is part of a custom order set of scripts..... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:43:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE3816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (mail5.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D04843D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmlewis@dslextreme.com) Received: (qmail 30933 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 03:43:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.92) by 192.168.8.93 with SMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:46 +0000 Message-ID: <1fdf4a4cc86a78ba4a69464a.20040626204346.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <001001c45bdd$ff276b50$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <1776a3885a58dea4d7ea.20040626010713.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <001001c45bdd$ff276b50$0200a8c0@satellite> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:43:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joshua Lewis" To: "dave" User-Agent: DSL Extreme Webmail (www.dslextreme.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a Stable Secure FreeBSD Mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 -0000 The MTA is PostFix http://bsdhound.com/downloads/Creating_a_Stable_Secure_FreeBSD_Mailserver.pdf Document date is 10/17/2003 So it is not to old. So far it is pretty accurate. Thank you, Joshua Lewis dave > Hi, > What mail server was this doc dealing with and can you give me the > address? Some clues as to the age is what version of fbsd was being > discussed, currently 4.10 is production stable while 5.2.1 is new > technology, even though i use that on my production systems. > Not sure as to the difference between md5 and blf password hashing, i > do > know that they both are methods of encrypting a password and supposedly > blf > is more secure but it also doesn't have compatibility with anything else. > HTH. > Dave. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:44:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C17E16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:44:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C4243D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 11709 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 03:44:01 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 03:44:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 19718 invoked by uid 555); 27 Jun 2004 03:45:07 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.247) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088307907-19698 for barbish3@adelphia.net; Sun, 27 Jun 07:45:07 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 182EB180; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:44:51 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:44:51 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: JJB Message-ID: <20040627034451.GB367@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , JJB , MICSKO Viktor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: MICSKO Viktor cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting a disk read only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:44:58 -0000 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 08:36:49AM -0400, JJB probably wrote: > Security Paranoia > It's very important that you completely understand the impact of > using the following command will have on your ability to make > changes to your system. >=20 > The simplest thing you can do is set the immutable flag on all > system binaries and /etc config files with: >=20 > chflags schg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) > /etc/*(*) >=20 > Setting the immutable flag on, means the files are marked as being > protected from being written over. Once you execute the above > command, no process can over write those files thus increasing the > level of difficulty for the attacker and increasing the odds in your > favor of the attacker leaving error messages in the system log. On > the other hand you as root user can not make any changes to those > file so marked either. Only if you can't remove that flags (that is, only if you're running at a securelevel>0). --=20 DoubleF If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. -- Maslow --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3kKywo7hT/9lVdwRAno4AJ4lEbqnzv3oQVE7Gao9/qh9Y0UW5gCfdCvX ayLRyrDUvUCPQEEVoA4yzCY= =A6lx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:45:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF73616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:45:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D443D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-240.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.240])i5R3j6HY028449; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:15:07 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Dan Finn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:15:05 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <89ceee704062312022da2887a@mail.gmail.com> <20040626012254.GA98588@math.uic.edu> <89ceee704062611583b2ffed2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <89ceee704062611583b2ffed2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271315.05991.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: burncd is unable to fixate on Dell Inpiron 2650 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:45:08 -0000 On Sunday 27 June 2004 04:28, Dan Finn wrote: > That did it. Why is it neccisary to specify the block size? Because the default block of 512 used by dd is not big enough to hold a cd block. Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:56:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C6B16A4D1 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:56:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3424A43D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (sheba.polands.org [172.16.1.33]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5R439Gk080479; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 23:03:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sheba.polands.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5R3txDi002440; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:55:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@sheba.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by sheba.polands.org (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i5R3tn80002439; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:55:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:55:49 -0500 From: Doug Poland To: Shaun Friedle Message-ID: <20040627035549.GA2414@polands.org> References: <1088268927.734.16.camel@localhost> <20040626174214.GA263@polands.org> <1088291718.1018.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1088291718.1018.2.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Asus P4S800D-E Deluxe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:56:51 -0000 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Shaun Friedle wrote: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42, Doug Poland wrote: > > > I currently have an Asus P4C800 Deluxe which is okay - until I turn off > > > ACPI and then I get a "Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while is > > > kernel mode" while booting. I need to be able to turn off ACPI as the > > > nvidia driver doesn't work with it on. > > > > > > The P4S800D-E Deluxe is very similar is features to the P4C800 Deluxe > > > and I want to make sure that it doesn't suffer from the same problem > > > before I buy it. > > > > > Sorry, it does suffer the same problem. I've got an nVidia 5700 > > that's running the XFree86 nv driver because of this issue. > > Hi, > It's a good job I checked first then. Do you know of any boards that > offer similar features, but don't have this problem? > No, I don't. Someone created a webapp that attempted to "rate" the performance of mobos for FBSD. The URL is: http://www.eilio.com/freebsd-motherboards/ I just checked it out and it seems to be stale now. There's a MySQL connect error visible on the page. Also, it didn't rate ACPI compatibility/performance which is something you really want to know. -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 04:07:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E07916A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D5A143D54 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so338379cwb for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.181.47 with SMTP id d47mr135356rnf; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:07:32 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Dancho Penev In-Reply-To: <20040626171145.GB900@freebsd.vmware.dpsca.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040626171145.GB900@freebsd.vmware.dpsca.bg> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to boot FreeBSD (dual-boot) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:37 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:11:45 +0300, Dancho Penev wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:25:24AM +1000, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > >I have a dual boot with Windows 2000 (ad0s1 is windows, ad0s2 is > >FreeBSD 5.2.1). I trashed a working dual-boot somehow. Now the > >problem is, I get the boot menu listing both Windows and FreeBSD, > >but only Windows boots (with F1). Pressing F2 for FreeBSD just > >gives a beep.I booted from the fixit cd and ran the commands seen > >in the handbook: > > > ># fdisk -B -b /hd/boot/boot0 /dev/ad0 > ># disklabel -B -b /hd/boot/boot0 /dev/ad0s2 > > For label use /boot/boot file, /boot/boot0 is for mbr. > > > > >/hd is the temporary directory I created to mount /dev/ad0s2a, > >so I guess my slice is still ok. Does not help! I even tried "disklabel -B /dev/ad0s2" because a diff between /hd/boot/boot and /boot/boot on the fixit yielded nothing. # disklabel /dev/ad0s2 lists the various partitions properly. I do have an MBR because I get a boot menu. Just can't get the MBR to talk to boot1 and boot2... Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 04:38:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C4C16A4CF; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:38:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE30D43D5C; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:38:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5R4cAfj044803; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:11 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:06 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> In-Reply-To: <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271408.06114.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -5.2 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: pirat cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can not make ltmdm ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:38:55 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:05, pirat wrote: > my laptop is dell inspiron 1100 with Conexant D480 MDC modem controller. > i tried to compile ltmdm from ports but strange enough, it failed. i spe= nt > about 2 months in looking or searching from internet if there were > any one else can use that modem in that machin with freebsd. That modem isn't supported by the ltmdm port (and never will be) > finally, i have to come back to my box and decide to make from ports. > as mentioned above, make failed. can any one please helps me or explains > me why do make failed ? Recent changes to the kernel broke it, I have a patch, but as I said above = it=20 won't help you anyway. PS if you'd asked me (as the port maintainer) directly I could have answere= d=20 it faster. =2D --=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3k8u5ZPcIHs/zowRAt0oAJ93vhTj91IGFeFeouKVcDv56JL1WQCeJRWN GuNMhQNspGiSMpw3/ScRJBk=3D =3DAuJh =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:03:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ADC16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:03:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00A643D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5R52UJW020058 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:02:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:53:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: tripwire on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:03:59 -0000 Hello, A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:22:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FF916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:22:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45C243D4C for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) i5R5QLtg002093; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:26:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5R5QLh9002092; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:26:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:26:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:22:52 -0000 On Saturday 26 June 2004 09:47 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > There is... just put your patches in files/patch-* files. Make sure > that if they are sorted alphabetically, their order is correct, i.e. if > you have two patches name them patch-zz-local-1 and patch-zz-local-2 or > similar -- this way they will be applied *after* any existing port > patches (because of the -zz- part) and local-1 will be applied before > local-2 ensuring the order you want to use. stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the patches merged? Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:25:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2785D16A4D5 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:25:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3C243D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:25:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by ns1.thought.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5R5OnRA073301 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.9p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i5R5OlKl089087 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R5Ola1089086 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:25:18 -0000 Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one with the ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to ethernet networks.'' In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. Can anybody help me? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:28:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B9C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:28:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1CE43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:28:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-01 ([10.10.4.10])i5R5Re6j003909 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from socal.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HZY00B9BCI4FD@ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.6.201] (Forwarded-For: [68.8.243.244]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (mshttpd); Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:27:40 -1000 Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:27:40 -1000 From: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com To: Scott Mitchell Message-id: <121731c12180f4.12180f4121731c@socal.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing cards in a reader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:28:13 -0000 On Saturday, June 26, 2004 12:56 pm Scott Mitchell responded thusly > On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:39:25AM -1000, hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com wrote: > > Aloha > > > > Hopefully this is a simple question. FreeBSD does not support my > > Olympus C-3000 Zoom camera so I bought a card reader (usb). It has > > 4 slots and when I boot or just plug it in I get 4 drives > > (da0, da1, da2, & da3). If I have a SmartMedia card installed I > > also see da2s1. > > > > da2s1 mounts fine and I am able to see and use all of the photo > files.> > > I have additional SM cards and would like to change the installed > card at > > will. If I do a umount and replace the card and try to mount > again I > > get an error "mount_msdosfs: /dev/da2s1: Invalid argument". I > should> say that the cards are different sizes. In order to mount > another card > > I have to unplug the usb cable and re-plug it in with the new > card in > > the slot. > > > > I have read man camcontrol and do not see an option I can use. > > > > Is there a way to do this without unplugging and re-plugging the > cable? > Try this (as root): > > # camcontrol devlist > > to find out which CAM device da2 belongs to. On this machine I get: > > <337 COMB > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 > (pass0,da2) at scbus2 target 0 > lun 0 (pass1,da4) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 1 > (da5,pass2) at scbus2 target 0 > lun 2 (da6,pass3) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 3 > (da7,pass4) > My SmartMedia slot happens to be da5, which is device 2:0:1. After > unmounting the card, you should be able to: > > # camcontrol eject 2:0:1 > > using the appropriate device number for your system, of course. > Then swap > cards and do: > > # camcontrol rescan 2:0:1 > > which should generate some lines in /var/log/messages telling you > about the > size of the new card. > > You might want to look into setting up the automounter to do the > rescan and > eject automatically when cards are mounted and unmounted, > respectively. > Cheers, > > Scott > Aloha Scott and thanks for staying awake and responding. I thought I had tried all of that camcontrol stuff before I posted but I am getting old so I tried what you suggested. Alas, it did not seem to help. Here is the output of the attempt: Boot with 128MB card installed. hp# ls -l /dev/da* crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 21 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 22 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 24 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 23 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da3 hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus total 16 drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16384 Jan 13 2003 dcim hp# camcontrol devlist at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (da0,pass0) at scbus0 target 0 lun 1 (da1,pass1) at scbus0 target 0 lun 2 (da2,pass2) at scbus0 target 0 lun 3 (da3,pass3) hp# umount /mnt/olympus hp# camcontrol eject 0:0:2 Unit stopped successfully, Media ejected Remove 128MB card and insert 8MB card hp# camcontrol rescan 0:0:2 Re-scan of 0:0:2 was successful hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus mount_msdosfs: /dev/da2s1: Invalid argument Unplug and replug usb cable and then hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus total 16 drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8192 Jun 26 14:24 dcim drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 1 1980 imolym Any other suggestions. (I hope :o)) Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 06:37:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4001616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:37:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0202A43D48 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:37:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 57679 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 26752 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.014703 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 15609 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:37:41 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:22:41 +0545) From: Bikrant To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:22:37 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Subject: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:37:56 -0000 Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in every messages that it retrives from the pop server. Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Thanks, Bikrant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 06:44:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5329916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:44:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01B043D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:44:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-240.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.240])i5R6i7HY063098; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:14:07 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Barbish3@adelphia.net, "MICSKO Viktor" Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:14:06 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271614.06896.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting a disk read only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:44:28 -0000 On Saturday 26 June 2004 22:06, JJB wrote: > Security Paranoia > It's very important that you completely understand the impact of > using the following command will have on your ability to make > changes to your system. > > The simplest thing you can do is set the immutable flag on all > system binaries and /etc config files with: > > chflags schg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) > /etc/*(*) > It seems to me that mounting all partitions from the disk as read only would achieve rather more; and more simply. But neither protects against direct writes to the raw device. And if you are really paranoid about this I think the only solution is a hardware switch. I suspect the linux 'hdparm' also has its limitations; only a hardware switch can protect against software bugs or a successful invasion. > Setting the immutable flag on, means the files are marked as being > protected from being written over. Once you execute the above > command, no process can over write those files thus increasing the > level of difficulty for the attacker and increasing the odds in your > favor of the attacker leaving error messages in the system log. On > the other hand you as root user can not make any changes to those > file so marked either. > > Ever time you want to make changes you have to issue the command to > turn off the immutable flag on all the same files. Use this command > to do that: > > chflags noschg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) > /etc/*(*) > > You can use "ls -lo" command to see the immutable flags of existing > > You could do this to any slice with chflags noschg /*(*) /usr/*(*) > what ever > Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 07:10:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DF616A4CE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B0343D3F; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E286FAE06D; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34940-02; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3FB5EAE025; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040627071005.3FB5EAE025@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-06-06 - 2004-06-26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:10:18 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 23-Jun : USENIX'04 ATC I'll be there! http://freebsddiary.org/usenix-atc-2004.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 07:18:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD61916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:18:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55F8E43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 18650 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 07:17:19 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 07:17:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 73902 invoked by uid 555); 27 Jun 2004 07:18:26 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.202) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088320706-73858 for keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; Sun, 27 Jun 11:18:26 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C183E398; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:18:08 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:18:08 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Jay Moore Message-ID: <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Jay Moore , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:18:16 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: >=20 > stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the > patches merged? >=20 By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. --=20 DoubleF "We are on the verge: Today our program proved Fermat's next-to-last theorem." -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3nSvwo7hT/9lVdwRAgNSAJ4+5LXFF+aa4+Roa7M/aQBFGKqlQgCbBnEm 3xq54p8TjgCJuNlGh5SwjAU= =CFVJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 07:39:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E7916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:39:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F9743D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@toyingwithfate.com) Received: from toyingwithfate.com (66-108-61-89.nyc.rr.com [66.108.61.89]) i5R7d2S6003893 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:39:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toyingwithfate.com (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5R7admN013983 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:37:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@toyingwithfate.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:36:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200406270737.i5R7admN013983@toyingwithfate.com> From: Will McCutcheon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on toyingwithfate.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: /boot/loader freezing up? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:39:06 -0000 I just installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 (from the ISO, not the latest patch level in CVS) and quickly ran into a problem related to the serial console. I dropped "-h" (sans-quotes, of course) into /boot.config so that it would boot with output going to the serial console, as I've done many times with older versions of FreeBSD on other systems. However, all startups after doing this freeze. I get the "F1 FreeBSD, F5 Drive 1, Default F1" prompt as usual, then get: /boot.config: -h BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 .. and nothing more. Nothing ever comes out the serial port and the system never finishes booting. This install was working fine until I tried getting it to boot through the serial console. Furthermore, because I never get to the point of the prompt to boot into single user mode, I can't figure out how to get in and remove /boot.config so that I can at least start up properly, if not with serial console support. Any clues as to how to hose that file, or better yet, how to get it to stop seizing up during bootup? Thanks for your time! W From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:07:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC3116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:07:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.sch.bme.hu (kaa.sch.bme.hu [152.66.208.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAE943D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:07:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tamas@bazmag.hu) Received: by lists.sch.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 102) id E675C858194; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ural14.sch.bme.hu [152.66.211.76]) by lists.sch.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC24D858161 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DE8064.1030705@bazmag.hu> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:08:04 +0200 From: MEZEI Tamas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: zorp and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:07:33 -0000 Hi, is there any way to do "transparent proxying" in FreeBSD? I'd be happy to have a fully functional Zorp server based on FreeBSD. Transparent proxying is working on Linux via the TPROXY patch, but ipf rdr methods are not really the same. Is there any way to implement that transparent stuff in FreeBSD? Are there any "unofficial" modifications (don't slap me please ;)? Thanks, Tamas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:20:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2E016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:20:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.111.132.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C083943D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:20:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukek@meibin.net) Received: (qmail 363 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jun 2004 08:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (192.168.10.35) by 192.168.20.5 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 08:20:24 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:19:09 +0900 From: Luke Kearney To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> References: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> Message-Id: <20040627171655.3372.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:20:41 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 Gary Kline granted us these pearls of wisdom: > > Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one > with the > > ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to > ethernet networks.'' > > In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. > > Can anybody help me? > > gary I have Thinkpad X30 which runs 4.9-p10 currently and I have had no real issues in setting it up. Mine has inbuilt NIC's though and there were no issues at all in recognising the ethernet or wireless NIC. X was really easy to setup and it's been really reliable since day1. HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:43:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:43:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6836C43D45 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:43:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA8F10685E; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:42:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DE8885.3080708@elvandar.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:42:45 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dave References: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tripwire on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:43:19 -0000 Hi Dave, dave wrote: > Hello, > A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as > broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? > Thanks. > Dave. > Well, i am not going to answer your question since i dont run tripwire... What i do run is AIDE, which does the same (keeps checksums of files in a db and checks them).. I don't know if you want to run it, but here it is /usr/ports/security/aide Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:47:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC82516A4CE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:47:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7825F43D2D; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from mxip07.cluster1.charter.net (mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.137])i5R8728I063902; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from unknown (HELO nacho) (68.189.127.165) by mxip07.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2004 04:07:02 -0400 Message-Id: <36u63c$1uk902@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> From: "Remi" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:06:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <200406271253.01432.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRb9mPwKJUXN0hUT1amNVISXHAuogAJzyKw cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:47:28 -0000 See that's I'm thinking, the raw performance is very attractive to me!! So what's this about a p4 1.7 outperforming a 2.8? You got link to benchmarks? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:doconnor@gsoft.com.au] Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:23 PM To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Remi; questions@freebsd.org; current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: > > I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one > > would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be > > easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 > > FreeBSD version? > > You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, > right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 > 2.8GHz running the same OS. A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. For raw performance it's "pretty nice" though :) - -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3j2V5ZPcIHs/zowRAoZpAKCnZMb/Kxk9wElcBhktj9NPDPsPggCgh6b2 iasKpu5F998wHLaC5flWA+E= =QBEE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D08D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5184143D4C for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 11267 invoked by uid 65534); 27 Jun 2004 08:53:02 -0000 Received: from p5090C460.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO gmx.de) (80.144.196.96) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 10:53:02 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1954550 Message-ID: <40DE8AC4.4060305@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:52:20 +0200 From: Phil Schulz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040520 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bikrant References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:05 -0000 Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 > for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > I'm not sure about this. But to me it doesn't look like this is added by fetchmail but rather by sendmail. Below you find the header which was added to your original email by fetchmail on my box. Note the difference in the 'from' part. Also I don't think that fetchmail 'speaks' (E)SMTP. Phil. > Received: from pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] > by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.0) > for schulzp@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:25:38 +0200 (CEST) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:53:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D513716A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666DC43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.162] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVPV-0003B4-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:13 +0200 Received: from [217.1.218.211] (helo=oliverfuchs.ath.cx) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVPT-0004VX-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:12 +0200 Received: from oliverfuchs.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5R8r86G006599verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:08 +0200 Received: (from oliverfuchs1@localhost) by oliverfuchs.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i5R8r6Pa006597 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:06 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:06 +0200 From: Oliver Fuchs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040627085306.GC6447@oliverfuchs.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:c2b2791553508cc938db2bcf18721a3c Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:15 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 > for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > > I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to > root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original > recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Hi, if you count all the RECEIVED: headers you will find that using the --invisible option fetchmail suppresses the fetchmail added RECEIVED: header ... all the others are added by sendmail Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:54:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D839F16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digitalpath.net (ns1.digitalpath.net [65.164.104.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3989843D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rholmes@digitalpath.net) Received: (qmail 17592 invoked by uid 1546); 27 Jun 2004 08:54:18 -0000 Received: from rholmes@digitalpath.net by pop by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.65. Clear:RC:1(12.25.190.12):. Processed in 0.160371 secs); 27 Jun 2004 08:54:18 -0000 Received: from 12-25-190-12.roseville.ca.digitalpath.net (HELO guppy) (12.25.190.12) by ns1.digitalpath.net with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 08:54:18 -0000 Message-ID: <000301c45c24$b5a3de90$0a00a8c0@guppy> From: "Richard Holmes" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:57:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: terabyte limit problem with vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:20 -0000 Shawn, Did you ever find a solution to the terabyte limit problem you reported last year on FreeBSD.Questions (09/06/2003 and 01/12/2004). I'm having exactly the same problem. I've got eight Maxtor 250GB SATA drives ganged together into one big RAID5 volume with a net size of 1636GB. Everything is fine until "newfs -U -O2 /dev/vinum/..." gives the "can't read old UFS1 superblock" error. I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 csvup'd to REL_ENG_5_2 in mid June 2004. Thanks, Richard Holmes Lambda Software Development Rocklin, CA (916) 390-2057 (cell) rholmes@midtown.net rholmes@digitalpath.net (soon to be discontinued) P.S. I've also been having some other problems with vinum. "vinum resetconfig" doesn't always wipe out all of the vinum drives and seems to not reliably erase the vinum database from all of the drives. After resetconfig, "vinum list" may show one or two drives remaining. To get rid of them all, I need to do multiple cycles of "vinum rm -f -r", "vinum stop" and "vinum start". Have also had problems with empty vinum volumes being corrupted after reboot (remember "newfs" failed, so nothing was ever written to the volume). After successfully creating and initializing the vinum RAID5 volume, I "stop" it, then reboot. After reboot, vinum insists on reinitializing the entire volume (an 8 hour process). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:54:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED8416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F19343D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVR9-0003OK-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:55 +0200 Received: from [217.1.218.211] (helo=oliverfuchs.ath.cx) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVR6-0001kP-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:52 +0200 Received: from oliverfuchs.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5R8sm6G006677verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:49 +0200 Received: (from oliverfuchs1@localhost) by oliverfuchs.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i5R8smhx006675 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:48 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:48 +0200 From: Oliver Fuchs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040627085447.GA6609@oliverfuchs.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200406260041.RAA20032@Hercules.ceosoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406260041.RAA20032@Hercules.ceosoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:c2b2791553508cc938db2bcf18721a3c Subject: Re: Sendmail permission problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:56 -0000 On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Jamie LaPointe wrote: > I am having problems with a Perl based application (Bugzilla 2.16.5) that > uses Sendmail. I recently upgraded from Sendmail version 8.9.3 to 8.12.10 > and am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release. I installed this version of Sendmail > from the Ports collection from the FreeBSD FTP site. Ever since I upgraded > to this new version I have been having the following problem when attempting > to send an email via Bugzilla (the following error is from the mailog): > > Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-mta[539]: starting daemon (8.12.10): > SMTP+queuei > > ng@00:30:00 > > Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-msp-queue[542]: starting daemon (8.12.10): > queue > > ing@00:30:00 > > Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-msp-queue[547]: starting daemon (8.12.10): > queue > > ing@00:30:00 > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: SYSERR(apache): > coll > > ect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4fA000630 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permission de > > nied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: from=apache, > size=46 > > 8, class=0, nrcpts=0, relay=apache@localhost > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: i5Q0C4fB000630: > DSN: > > collect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4fA000630 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permissi > > on denied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fB000630: SYSERR(apache): > queu > > eup: cannot create queue file ./qfi5Q0C4fB000630, euid=1003: Permission > denied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: SYSERR(apache): > coll > > ect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4K8000631 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permission de > > nied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: from=apache, > size=45 > > 9, class=0, nrcpts=0, relay=apache@localhost > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: i5Q0C4K9000631: > DSN: > > collect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4K8000631 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permissi > > on denied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K9000631: SYSERR(apache): > queu > > eup: cannot create queue file ./qfi5Q0C4K9000631, euid=1003: Permission > denied > > > > It sure appears that something is screwed up with Permissions, yet > /var/spool/clientmqueue has the following permission: > > -bash-2.05b# ls -l > > total 32 > > drwxrwx--- 2 smmsp smmsp 512 Jun 25 12:09 clientmqueue > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon 512 Apr 6 08:53 cups > > drwxrwxr-x 2 uucp dialer 512 Jun 25 17:11 lock > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root daemon 512 Feb 23 12:41 lpd > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon 16384 Jun 25 15:17 mqueue > > drwx------ 2 root daemon 512 Feb 23 12:41 opielocks > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon 512 Feb 23 12:41 output > > drwxr-xr-x 15 root wheel 512 Jun 25 11:48 postfix > > drwxrwxrwt 2 root wheel 512 Apr 6 08:53 samba > > > > >From everything that I have read this is correct. I also checked the > permission for the sendmail binary and it has the following permission: > > -bash-2.05b# ls -l /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail > > -r-xr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 635864 Feb 23 12:42 sendmail A look at SECURITY doc in /usr/local/share/doc/sendmail gives me: -r-xr-sr-x root smmsp ... /PATH/TO/sendmail drwxrwx--- smmsp smmsp ... /var/spool/clientmqueue drwx------ root wheel ... /var/spool/mqueue -r--r--r-- root wheel ... /etc/mail/sendmail.cf -r--r--r-- root wheel ... /etc/mail/submit.cf Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:09:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC6D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:09:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AAD43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:09:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by ns1.thought.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5R993RA073624; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.9p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i5R991Kl089625; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R990oU089624; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Luke Kearney Message-ID: <20040627090900.GA89574@tao.thought.org> References: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> <20040627171655.3372.LUKEK@meibin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627171655.3372.LUKEK@meibin.net> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Gary Kline cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:09:17 -0000 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Luke Kearney wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 > Gary Kline granted us these pearls of wisdom: > > > > > Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one > > with the > > > > ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to > > ethernet networks.'' > > > > In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. > > > > Can anybody help me? > > > > gary > > I have Thinkpad X30 which runs 4.9-p10 currently and I have had no real > issues in setting it up. Mine has inbuilt NIC's though and there were no > issues at all in recognising the ethernet or wireless NIC. X was really > easy to setup and it's been really reliable since day1. > > HTH > It helps to a point. The thing is that my budget is limited to th $200-$300 range. I'm not looking for anything fast ... just smething solid with a good drive and CDROM. And a NC that just-works. I've been checking the freebsd laptop list and working from these, but still flying blind pretty much. Anybody else have laptop success stories to share in the 266-400MHz range?? thanks to all, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:17:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3477616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:17:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18BC743D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:17:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 73258 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10380 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from bikrant@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.78):. Processed in 0.010958 secs); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from smtp3.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.78) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 19872 invoked by uid 514); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp3.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:34 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:34 +0545) From: Bikrant Neupane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:32 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271502.32319.bikrant@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp3.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 cc: Oliver Fuchs cc: Phil Schulz Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:17:44 -0000 Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. This is the one added by fetchmail Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) and this one is the full header =46rom bikrant@wlink.com.np Sun Jun 27 00:32:39 2004 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr0305= 63 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 Delivered-To: bikrant@wlink.com.np Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) Received: (qmail 31304 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 86161 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from bikrant@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 10= 02=20 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.607579 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8704 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np= =20 (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004=20 11:50:01 +0545) You can see that mail is to be delivered to bikrant@wlink.com.np but when i= t=20 is fetched by fetchmail it is changed to root@localhost. regards, Bikrant On Sunday 27 June 2004 12:22, Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header = in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id > i5QIldIr030563 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > > I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to > root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original > recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. > > Thanks, > Bikrant > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:18:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584D016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6446543D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 73285 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 10738 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.78):. Processed in 0.010929 secs); 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: from smtp3.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.78) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20048 invoked by uid 514); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:59 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp3.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:59 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:59 +0545) From: Bikrant Neupane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:57 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Organization: World Link Communications Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271502.57057.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp3.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:08 -0000 Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. This is the one added by fetchmail Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) and this one is the full header =46rom bikrant@wlink.com.np Sun Jun 27 00:32:39 2004 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr0305= 63 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 Delivered-To: bikrant@wlink.com.np Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) Received: (qmail 31304 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 86161 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from bikrant@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 10= 02=20 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.607579 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8704 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np= =20 (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004=20 11:50:01 +0545) You can see that mail is to be delivered to bikrant@wlink.com.np but when i= t=20 is fetched by fetchmail it is changed to root@localhost. regards, Bikrant On Sunday 27 June 2004 12:22, Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header = in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id > i5QIldIr030563 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > > I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to > root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original > recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. > > Thanks, > Bikrant > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:18:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB5016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bilbo.otenet.gr (bilbo.otenet.gr [195.170.0.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5512D43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a136.otenet.gr [212.205.215.136]) i5R9IeFr020446; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:44 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5R9IX4q019379; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:33 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R9IXt8019378; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:33 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:33 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Sergey Zaharchenko Message-ID: <20040627091833.GA19300@gothmog.gr> References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> cc: Jay Moore cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:53 -0000 On 2004-06-27 11:18, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: > > stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the > > patches merged? > > By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. Just running `make patch' should be enough. The dependencies will take care of running `make fetch', `make checksum', `make extract' and *then* `make patch'. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:35:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:35:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 743D543D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 24842 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 09:34:08 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:34:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 9440 invoked by uid 555); 27 Jun 2004 09:35:16 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.205) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088328915-9428 for keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; Sun, 27 Jun 13:35:15 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2A9B381; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:34:58 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:34:57 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20040627093457.GA7288@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Giorgos Keramidas , Sergey Zaharchenko , Jay Moore , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> <20040627091833.GA19300@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627091833.GA19300@gothmog.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Jay Moore cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:35:17 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:18:33PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas probably wrote: > On 2004-06-27 11:18, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: > > > stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the > > > patches merged? > > > > By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. >=20 > Just running `make patch' should be enough. The dependencies will take > care of running `make fetch', `make checksum', `make extract' and *then* > `make patch'. >=20 > - Giorgos >=20 True, but being more `verbose' and giving a more self-explanatory command sometimes helps to understand what it actually is going to do. BTW I still forgot to mention what seemed obvious --- the patched source will be in the working directory (/usr/ports/.../.../work if you didn't change anything in make.conf). --=20 DoubleF Aquadextrous, adj.: Possessing the ability to turn the bathtub faucet on and off with your toes. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets" --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3pTAwo7hT/9lVdwRAsurAJ9ASRfBnuKkpcgPHJaHT089xYCxGQCdGy/n 86eWgXrrjzfbqfTsG1IibA8= =MJP6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 10:30:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D95116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52204.mail.yahoo.com (web52204.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1F6843D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdsys@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627103006.31532.qmail@web52204.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.5.254.248] by web52204.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:30:06 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:30:06 -0700 (PDT) From: bryan cassidy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: make index error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:08 -0000 Running 4.10. I ran a 'make index' in /usr/ports just now and i get the following error Generating INDEX - please wait..tkscanfax-1.02: "/usr/ports/japanese/tk80" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete ===> comms/tkscanfax failed *** Error code 1 1 error Thanks __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 10:35:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A485D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:35:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1662043D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040627103324.NVJE2927.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:33:24 +0100 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1BeX0J-0002Z9-73; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:35:19 +0100 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5RAZ9pm086787; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:35:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:35:09 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com Message-ID: <20040627103509.GB85115@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <121731c12180f4.12180f4121731c@socal.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <121731c12180f4.12180f4121731c@socal.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing cards in a reader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:35:54 -0000 On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 07:27:40PM -1000, hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com wrote: > Aloha Scott and thanks for staying awake and responding. > > I thought I had tried all of that camcontrol stuff > before I posted but I am getting old so I tried what > you suggested. Alas, it did not seem to help. Here is > the output of the attempt: Hi Robert, Weird - that's what works for me, so I don't know how much more help I can offer, but here are a few suggestions that might help us figure out what's going on... > Boot with 128MB card installed. > > hp# ls -l /dev/da* > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da0 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 21 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 22 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 24 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2s1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 23 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da3 Ah... you're running FreeBSD 5 - it was pretty late when I wrote that first reply, so I didn't notice that immediately. Unlike FreeBSD 4, where stuff in /dev/ had to be created manually, FreeBSD 5 uses devfs to create the device nodes as needed, when devices come and go. I haven't actually used my card reader on 5 yet, so I could be missing something obvious here... > Remove 128MB card and insert 8MB card > > hp# camcontrol rescan 0:0:2 > Re-scan of 0:0:2 was successful What does 'fdisk da2' give you at this point? Do you get anything in /var/log/messages when you insert the new card? It might be worth doing a 'camcontrol start' after the rescan, just in case, but I don't really think that will make any difference. Since you're running FreeBSD 5, it might be worth re-porting your question to the freebsd-current mailing list, to see if anyone there can shed some light on this. Sorry I can't be more help, Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 10:59:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B0516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:59:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cannabis.dataforce.net (cannabis.dataforce.net [195.42.160.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB0F43D45 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ky@df.ru) Received: from proxy.rostelekom.ru (proxy.rostelekom.ru [195.42.179.169]) by cannabis.dataforce.net (8.11.6p2-DF5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id i5RAx7X18545 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:59:07 +0400 From: "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> Subject: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ky@df.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:59:11 -0000 I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves almost imidiately after the change. Tried to find some ready solution but fails. There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly stat(2) calls). kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for file operations. So is there some other points to build a file replication? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 11:23:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A8816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:23:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.111.132.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF2A43D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:23:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukek@meibin.net) Received: (qmail 599 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jun 2004 11:22:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.8?) (192.168.10.8) by 192.168.20.5 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 11:22:44 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:20:26 +0900 From: Luke Kearney To: ky@df.ru In-Reply-To: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> References: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> Message-Id: <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.07.01 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:23:01 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." spake thus: > I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. > > I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. > I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves > almost imidiately after the change. > Tried to find some ready solution but fails. > There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly > stat(2) calls). > kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. > So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for > file operations. > > So is there some other points to build a file replication? Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a cron job every N minutes. /usr/ports/net/rsync HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 26 17:54:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90B116A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8757C43D31 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganeshkini@comcast.net) Received: from vasudhalaptop (h0003476f5fee.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.61.157.96]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2004062617540501400kvkgge>; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:06 +0000 Message-ID: <001201c45ba6$90429d40$6701a8c0@vasudhalaptop> From: "Ganesh Kini" To: Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:53:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2739.300 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:10:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Gigafast usb wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:08 -0000 Is it possible to configure Gigafast wireless network card WF741-UIC on = x86 machine? Thanks Ganesh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 12:14:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4434516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:14:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp19.wxs.nl (smtp19.wxs.nl [195.121.6.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846F643D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:14:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marco@beishuizen.info) Received: from tsunami.bsd (ipd50a233c.speed.planet.nl [213.10.35.60]) by smtp19.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0HZY005JIVBDOK@smtp19.wxs.nl> for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:14:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:14:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@tsunami.bsd To: FreeBSD questions mailing list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT FreeBSD: Homepage: Subject: Linux emulator core dumps at install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:14:37 -0000 I tried to install the Linux emulator from the ports on FreeBSD 4.10-stable (i386) but it crashes when it installs: ... ===> Installing for linux_base-7.1_7 ===> Generating temporary packing list kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3 glibc-common-2.2.4-33.i386.rpm package glibc not listed in conflict index glibc-2.2.4-33.i386.rpm execution of glibc-2.2.4-33 script failed, exit status 0 *** Error code 1 ... Is there a solution for this? Thanks, Marco -- Blore's Razor: Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 12:33:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274B116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:33:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C508043D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:33:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w41so1126359cwb for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.1 with SMTP id b1mr66968rnc; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:33:05 +0200 From: Arjan Van Leeuwen To: Ganesh Kini In-Reply-To: <001201c45ba6$90429d40$6701a8c0@vasudhalaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001201c45ba6$90429d40$6701a8c0@vasudhalaptop> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gigafast usb wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:33:20 -0000 Hi, On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:53:53 -0400, Ganesh Kini wrote: > > Is it possible to configure Gigafast wireless network card WF741-UIC on x86 machine? Check the atuwi project (http://vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/), it might work with this card. Arjan > > Thanks > Ganesh > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 12:49:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796E416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:49:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pinky.otenet.gr (pinky.otenet.gr [195.170.0.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CBF43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i5RCn91Z025875; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:49:10 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion.daedalusnetworks.priv [127.0.0.1])i5RCoaUi001860; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:50:46 +0300 Received: (from keramida@localhost)i5RCoQhD001859; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:50:26 +0300 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:50:26 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: antenneX Message-ID: <20040627125025.GA1850@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20040624190828.GA821@gothmog.gr> <007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:49:48 -0000 On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX wrote: > > Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup & I did change the IP for > server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight > though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and > apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on > server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent > over to server2. > > I'm still missing something here..... I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. Can you, please, show me what these commands print? server1# ifconfig -a server1# host server1.example.net server1# host server2.example.net server1# host -t mx example.net server2# ifconfig -a server2# host server1.example.net server2# host server2.example.net server2# host -t mx example.net A detailed description (including verbatim copies of the relevant files) of the Sendmail setup on each host would be very nice too. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:33:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE63216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:33:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8653443D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:33:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D4569A39; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:33:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:33:48 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Thomas Moyer" Message-Id: <20040627093348.211d0d7e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> References: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shared Partitions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:33:53 -0000 "Thomas Moyer" wrote: > I have a Fat32 partition that I use to share files between Windows and > FreeBSD. I have it mounted on /home and when it mounts the owner of all > the files is root and the group is wheel. Is there a way to change that > so it acts like a normal home partition? In other words the individual > directories and files are owned by the user etc. Unfortunately, no. This is because FAT doesn't support users and groups (or permissions for that matter) so the mount has to have everything owned by one user/group. Thus it won't work as a /home partition because each /home/ directory should be owned by the user. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:39:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD6C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584BF43D39 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i5RDe1pj013249; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:40:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i5RDdw80013243; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:39:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:39:58 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: Doug Poland In-Reply-To: <20040627035549.GA2414@polands.org> Message-ID: <20040627093830.H13090@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <1088268927.734.16.camel@localhost> <20040626174214.GA263@polands.org><20040627035549.GA2414@polands.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Asus P4S800D-E Deluxe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:36 -0000 I've noticed that many newer Asus boards have ACPI problems with FreeBSD. Its a shame because i have always bought asus boards since I learned of them. On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Doug Poland wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Shaun Friedle wrote: >> On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42, Doug Poland wrote: >>>> I currently have an Asus P4C800 Deluxe which is okay - until I turn off >>>> ACPI and then I get a "Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while is >>>> kernel mode" while booting. I need to be able to turn off ACPI as the >>>> nvidia driver doesn't work with it on. >>>> >>>> The P4S800D-E Deluxe is very similar is features to the P4C800 Deluxe >>>> and I want to make sure that it doesn't suffer from the same problem >>>> before I buy it. >>>> >>> Sorry, it does suffer the same problem. I've got an nVidia 5700 >>> that's running the XFree86 nv driver because of this issue. >> >> Hi, >> It's a good job I checked first then. Do you know of any boards that >> offer similar features, but don't have this problem? >> > No, I don't. Someone created a webapp that attempted to "rate" the > performance of mobos for FBSD. The URL is: > > http://www.eilio.com/freebsd-motherboards/ > > I just checked it out and it seems to be stale now. There's a MySQL > connect error visible on the page. Also, it didn't rate ACPI > compatibility/performance which is something you really want to know. > > -- > Regards, > Doug > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:41:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9B216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:41:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E4D43D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i5RDfitu013271; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:41:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i5RDfi1k013268; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:41:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:41:44 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: dave In-Reply-To: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> Message-ID: <20040627094033.F13090@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tripwire on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:41:16 -0000 I was able to get a really old version in ports to work, but not the most recent build. The old version occasionally crashed on me when running a check on the filesystem. I would look at some of the alternatives to tripwire in ports for a 5.x system. On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, dave wrote: > Hello, > A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as > broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? > Thanks. > Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:43:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6C016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:43:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cannabis.dataforce.net (cannabis.dataforce.net [195.42.160.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A41E43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ky@df.ru) Received: from proxy.rostelekom.ru (proxy.rostelekom.ru [195.42.179.169]) by cannabis.dataforce.net (8.11.6p2-DF5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id i5RDgjb28451; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:42:46 +0400 From: "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." To: Luke Kearney Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:42:44 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> In-Reply-To: <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271742.44298.ky@df.ru> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ky@df.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:43:23 -0000 On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:20, Luke Kearney wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 > > "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." spake thus: > > I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. > > > > I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files > > count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files > > to slaves almost imidiately after the change. > > Tried to find some ready solution but fails. > > There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes > > silly stat(2) calls). > > kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. > > So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls > > for file operations. > > > > So is there some other points to build a file replication? > > Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate > file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet > should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you > need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a > cron job every N minutes. > > /usr/ports/net/rsync Yes. I use rsync already and its a great tool. But actually its too slow with numbers of fles > 100k. Its takes more then 5mins to found just few files to update in list of 500k files. So I decide rsync to be a transport manager for my own replication tool. Right now I'm writing a kernel module that catches all file syscalls that can modify a file. Its almost done exept rmdir & unlink calls - I don't know how to get a cwd from a thread. Function kern___getcwd sometimes fails with "not a directory" error. BTW, whats a good place where can I ask about kernel programming? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:44:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E8B16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:44:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8C743D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8CA69A39; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:44:05 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: MEZEI Tamas Message-Id: <20040627094405.5f2ccc88.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <40DE8064.1030705@bazmag.hu> References: <40DE8064.1030705@bazmag.hu> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zorp and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:44:50 -0000 MEZEI Tamas wrote: > Hi, > > is there any way to do "transparent proxying" in FreeBSD? I'd be happy > to have a fully functional Zorp server based on FreeBSD. > > Transparent proxying is working on Linux via the TPROXY patch, but ipf > rdr methods are not really the same. Is there any way to implement that > transparent stuff in FreeBSD? Are there any "unofficial" modifications > (don't slap me please ;)? Never heard of "Zorp", but I've used Squid for transparent HTTP proxying, worked fine. If you're looking for an "overall" proxy, I don't know. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:56:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BD616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:56:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14922.mail.yahoo.com (web14922.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.225.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4997B43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nirv199@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.138.44.110] by web14922.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:55:32 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:55:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Paulo Roberto To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:56:03 -0000 Hello, Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. thanks, Paulo __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:00:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A286016A4D0 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9124243D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so349470cwb for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with SMTP id d15mr58059rng; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:55 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Bikrant Neupane In-Reply-To: <200406271502.57057.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> <200406271502.57057.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:00:55 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:57 +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote: > > > Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( > Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. > > This is the one added by fetchmail > > Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] > by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) > for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > (NPT) > Hello! Would you mind posting your .fetchmailrc here? I think it should have a "user1 there is user2 here" clause. poll server.host with proto POP3 user 'remoteuser' there is 'localuser' here options flush fetchall ssl So mail for remoteuser gets delivered to localuser. Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:04:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DF716A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:04:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14928.mail.yahoo.com (web14928.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.225.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA50C43D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:04:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nirv199@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627140416.93626.qmail@web14928.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.138.44.110] by web14928.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:04:16 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:04:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Paulo Roberto To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: fbdev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:04:36 -0000 Hi, Second question in a row... I am trying to configure X to use the "linux frame buffer", but when I try to run X, it complains about no "fbdev" module. It seems X does not come with it installed. Any procedure on getting fbdev working on 4.10? thanks again, Paulo __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:08:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AA616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D4543D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@swbell.net) Received: from SAGEAME (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.68.247.73]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5RE6xdH003624; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00f601c45c50$3e268f30$0200000a@SAGEAME> From: "antenneX" To: "Malcolm Kay" , "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <00ce01c45ba0$343ffc00$0200000a@SAGEAME><20040626184008.GB1016@gothmog.gr> <00da01c45bcb$b1381d70$0200000a@SAGEAME> <200406271305.21121.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:08:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A SED script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: antenneX List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:42 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Malcolm Kay" To: "antenneX" ; "Giorgos Keramidas" Cc: Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 10:35 PM Subject: Re: A SED script > On Sunday 27 June 2004 07:49, antenneX wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Giorgos Keramidas" > > To: "antenneX" > > Cc: > > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 1:40 PM > > Subject: Re: A SED script > > > > > On 2004-06-26 12:08, antenneX wrote: > > > > I cannot get it to work on another file (perl.pl file) to change the > > > > line: > > > > $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX060"; to $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX070"; > > > > > > > > I suspect I'm not handling the quotes or other operators correctly > > > > and it > > > > > > just ignores the change. > > > > > > > > Here's the snippet of the script I'm trying to use: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > new=`grep -i new /path/to/newfile` > > > > old=`grep -i new /path/to/oldfile` > > It would seem that the variables new and old will both be set to something > containing 'new' (perhaps not in lower case). > How does this relate to "ATX060" and "ATX070"? > > > > > sed -i.bak -e "s/$old/$new/" /path/to/myfile > > > > > > The results depend heavily on the existence and contents of the two > > > > files > > > > > named /path/to/{old,new}file. I'm sure if you change the sed line to: > > > > > > sed -i.bak -e 's/ATX060/ATX070/' /path/to/myfile > > > > > > it will all work fine. > > > > Indeed, this works fine. The old/new files are needed to set the > > varibles to hold the new number for the next time as this is run via > > cron. > > > > You've still not shown us the relevant lines of /path/to/newfile or > /path/to/oldfile > > > old = ATX060 > > new = ATX070 > > What are these? The contents of /path/to/{new,old}file? > If so sed will be looking to change the string "old = ATX060" to > "new = ATX070". > > Or do the files simply consist of > ATX060 > and > ATX070 > ? > If so then grep is not the right command to load the variables old and new. > Try: > new=`cat /path/to/newfile` > old=`cat /path/to/oldfile` > > Malcolm > I've solved the script ptoblem with a verbose run of the script & it told me exactly what was wrong -- the two varibles newfile & oldfile were not defined properly. Running this showed the error: /bin/sh -xv ./myscript Sorry I didn't think to do this in the first place. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:27:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC25416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gldis.ca (constans.gldis.ca [66.11.169.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B7A43D45 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gldis.ca (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with SMTP id i5REdSqi048347; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:39:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: gldis.ca: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol Message-ID: <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 From: Jeremy Faulkner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paulo Roberto References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:27 -0000 Paulo Roberto wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? > I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > > thanks, > > Paulo > .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert them to a standard ISO image. -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:27:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130AA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C282343D39 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FA969A39; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:27:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:27:31 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: ky@df.ru Message-Id: <20040627102731.63243d11.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200406271742.44298.ky@df.ru> References: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> <200406271742.44298.ky@df.ru> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:52 -0000 "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." wrote: > On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:20, Luke Kearney wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 > > > > "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." spake thus: > > > I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. > > > > > > I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files > > > count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files > > > to slaves almost imidiately after the change. > > > Tried to find some ready solution but fails. > > > There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes > > > silly stat(2) calls). > > > kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. > > > So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls > > > for file operations. > > > > > > So is there some other points to build a file replication? > > > > Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate > > file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet > > should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you > > need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a > > cron job every N minutes. > > > > /usr/ports/net/rsync > > Yes. I use rsync already and its a great tool. > But actually its too slow with numbers of fles > 100k. > Its takes more then 5mins to found just few files to update in list of 500k > files. > > So I decide rsync to be a transport manager for my own replication tool. > Right now I'm writing a kernel module that catches all file syscalls that can > modify a file. Its almost done exept rmdir & unlink calls - I don't know how > to get a cwd from a thread. Function kern___getcwd sometimes fails with "not > a directory" error. > BTW, whats a good place where can I ask about kernel programming? freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org is the best place I know of. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 15:00:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B286416A4F7 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:00:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E41443D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@swbell.net) Received: from SAGEAME (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.68.247.73]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5REwedH022496; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00fb01c45c57$75816160$0200000a@SAGEAME> From: "antenneX" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <20040624190828.GA821@gothmog.gr><007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> <20040627125025.GA1850@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:00:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: antenneX List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:00:21 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "antenneX" Cc: Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:50 AM Subject: Re: Using sendmail > On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX wrote: > > > > Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup & I did change the IP for > > server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight > > though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and > > apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on > > server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent > > over to server2. > > > > I'm still missing something here..... > > I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and > IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. > > Can you, please, show me what these commands print? > Giorgos: Thanks for your patience and willingness to help. As far as sendmail (8.12.11) options, my configs are pretty much "out of the box" except for the spamassassin & majordomo addins. I believe below is all the pertinent info, but if I've missed anything needed, just let me know: server1 = franklin-belle.com (gateway/firewall/nat/router) server2 = antentop.com (server is on same LAN with NAT route from server1) sageame@franklin-belle:-) host franklin-belle.com franklin-belle.com has address 65.68.247.73 franklin-belle.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.franklin-belle.com sageame@franklin-belle:-) host antentop.com antentop.com has address 65.68.247.75 antentop.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.antentop.com sageame@franklin-belle:-) host -t mx franklin-belle.com franklin-belle.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.franklin-belle.com sageame@antentop:-) host -t mx antentop.com antentop.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.antentop.com local-host-names (franklin-belle.com) franklin-belle.com mail.franklin-belle.com local-host-names (antentop.com) antentop.com mail.antentop.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 15:06:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A197C16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC5643D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@swbell.net) Received: from SAGEAME (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.68.247.73]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5RF5HdH024322; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <012601c45c58$6230a890$0200000a@SAGEAME> From: "antenneX" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <20040624190828.GA821@gothmog.gr><007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> <20040627125025.GA1850@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:06:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using sendmail - One more file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: antenneX List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:57 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "antenneX" Cc: Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:50 AM Subject: Re: Using sendmail > On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX wrote: > > > > Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup & I did change the IP for > > server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight > > though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and > > apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on > > server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent > > over to server2. > > > > I'm still missing something here..... > > I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and > IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. > I forgot to include the mailertable from server1: mail.antentop.com esmtp.mail.antentop.com No mailertable on server2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:13:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E243C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:13:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from flock1.newmail.ru (morda.newmail.ru [212.48.140.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA34C43D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from EugeneIvanov@nm.ru) Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 16:07:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 213.177.101.92) (eugeneivanov.nm.ru@213.177.101.92) by smtpd.newmail.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 16:07:35 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:13:01 +0400 From: Eugene Ivanov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Business Organization: Super Assembler Software X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1015758375.20040627201301@nm.ru> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Subject: why link broken?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugene Ivanov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:13:34 -0000 SGVsbG8sIGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zLg0KDQppIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIGEgZmlsZQ0KaHR0 cDovL2Z0cDkudXMuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvcHViL0ZyZWVCU0QvSVNPLUlNQUdFUy1pMzg2LzUu Mi4xLzUuMi4xLVJFTEVBU0UtaTM4Ni1kaXNjMS5pc28NCmFuZCAyMDAgTWIgaXMgbm93IHRv IG1lLCBidXQgZG9uJ3QgZG93bmxvYWQgOigNCg0Kd2h5PyENCg0KRXVnZW5lLg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:15:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C711F16A4D5 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:15:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9443443D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9373B34FEE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:15:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:15:52 +0200 From: Miguel Mendez To: Jeremy Faulkner Message-Id: <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12-gtk2-20040617 (GTK+ 2.4.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5" cc: nirv199@yahoo.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:15:27 -0000 --Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 Jeremy Faulkner wrote: Hi, > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue > > files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert > them to a standard ISO image. Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 --Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA3vK6nLctrNyFFPERAtSlAJ9EtpZPUiKt41vip9uwNots/A6R9ACgpnws E3FIUl1KtFDg05TqnBwVFyk= =1Hz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:19:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8349716A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:19:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A1943D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:19:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA13110685E; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:19:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DEF3AA.3020309@elvandar.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:19:54 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Ivanov References: <1015758375.20040627201301@nm.ru> In-Reply-To: <1015758375.20040627201301@nm.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: why link broken?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:19:58 -0000 Eugene Ivanov wrote: > Hello, freebsd-questions. > > i downloading a file > http://ftp9.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.2.1/5.2.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > and 200 Mb is now to me, but don't download :( > > why?! > > Eugene. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Network problems might be the reason, did you try another host ? If not, please try another one, perhaps that does work. Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:21:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E060516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:21:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A1F43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5RGLQ0W064010; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:21:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5RGLQAe064009; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:21:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:21:25 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Paulo Roberto Message-ID: <20040627162125.GA58695@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:21:38 -0000 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:55:32AM -0700, Paulo Roberto wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? > I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > cdrdao does it. Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:34:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E4316A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out008.verizon.net (out008pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FCE43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out008.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040627163426.JMDL27801.out008.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:34:26 -0500 Message-ID: <40DEF6FF.9030703@mac.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:34:07 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kai Grossjohann References: <40D33478.3060705@vo.lu> <86n02qm2q3.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> In-Reply-To: <86n02qm2q3.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out008.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:34:26 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any use to build from source? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:43 -0000 Kai Grossjohann wrote: > Charles Swiger writes: >> Oh, yes. The first time you run into a problem and fix it yourself, >> or make a change to the programs to add some feature that you want, >> you will discover the serious advantages. >> >> However, if you never try to fix bugs or write code for yourself, then >> you aren't going to gain nearly as much from using source compared >> with using precompiled binaries. > > How does one deal with local changes in the software when installing > as a port? One way is to put your local changes into files/patch-aa [1] using diff format. Other times it's as simple as defining some environment variables by passing them into make, via /etc/make.conf, etc. -- -Chuck [1]: Choose whatever name seems appropriate, perhaps files/patch-src-file.c; the patch-aa naming convention works fine but is depricated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:48:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5053816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F219543D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j.e.drews@att.net) Received: from 204.127.135.59 ([204.127.135.59]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <20040627164821113001motne>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:21 +0000 Received: from [64.105.56.145] by 204.127.135.59; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:26 +0000 From: j.e.drews@att.net To: Gary Kline Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:26 +0000 Message-Id: <062720041648.24888.40DEFA5A000B6F020000613821602806519C990A9D0BD20AD206@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (May 27 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: ai5lLmRyZXdzQGF0dC5uZXQ= cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:32 -0000 Hi Gary: You can look here and see if your Thinkpad runs FreeBSD: The FreeBSD Laptop Compatibility List http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/ This list is up to date. I had a 600E Thinkpad running 4.9. The USB printer, scanner and Lexar flash ram storage worked well on it. Kind regards, Jonathan > > Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one > with the > > ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to > ethernet networks.'' > > In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. > > Can anybody help me? > > gary > > > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:13:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D204416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:13:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gldis.ca (constans.gldis.ca [66.11.169.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6128E43D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gldis.ca (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with SMTP id i5RHPCqi051795; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:25:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: gldis.ca: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol Message-ID: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:16:43 -0400 From: Jeremy Faulkner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miguel Mendez References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' cc: nirv199@yahoo.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:13:22 -0000 Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 > Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > > Hi, > > >>>Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue >>>files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > > >>.bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert >>them to a standard ISO image. > > > Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), > and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. > > Cheers, What international standard describes their format? Windows is not a standard. -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:14:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EF916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:14:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7036943D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:14:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945ED826A; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:14:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71388-06; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:14:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C358260; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:14:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DF0045.2030902@wcborstel.nl> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:13:41 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Sawyer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Cable management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:14:04 -0000 Bill Sawyer wrote: >>>>Jorn Argelo 06/26 3:25 PM >>> >>>> >>>> >Main point is, I want to get rid of VGA cables, power cables, PS2 >cables, USB cables etcetera. So I have more use of a big cable gutter >then a patch panel. > > > >Jorn, > >Sounds like you're a good candidate for a KVM switch, if you have more than one computer in the same workspace. I'd recommend looking on eBay for Cybex KVM switches. > >Bill Sawyer >Information Systems >Six Flags St. Louis >(636) 938-5300 x. 231 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I already have a KVM switch :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:25:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B5916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:25:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DAB43D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: by av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1F48837E45; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.177]) by av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117CE37E59 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gadget (h130n1fls11o822.telia.com [213.64.66.130]) by smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503638015 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:42 +0200 (CEST) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:53 +0200 Organization: Home Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:25:44 -0000 Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > What international standard describes their format? > > Windows is not a standard. Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a "real" standard. /Daniel Eriksson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:41:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7318C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:41:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD86F43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040627174108.FLFU3317.out006.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:41:08 -0500 Message-ID: <40DF06A0.10801@mac.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:40:48 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 3BSD References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:41:07 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forgot to add... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:41:09 -0000 3BSD wrote: > One thing I forgot to add to be previous e-mail about hardware > compatibility was that I'm using the DVI port of my graphics card, > connected to an LCD display, will that pose any problems? Generally not. To the extent that your configuration of video card and monitor can be treated as a generic (s)VGA display, FreeBSD will be plug-and-play for text mode (booting, console), and will also work genericly under X11. Getting 3D hardware support going for fast OpenGL stuff, and/or doing a multimonitor display mode are more complicated questions, but generally one can get such things working after more tweaking and time spent on your part. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:45:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9BA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f127.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF1B43D2D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crollins666@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:45:08 -0700 Received: from 216.19.22.118 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:08 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.19.22.118] X-Originating-Email: [crollins666@hotmail.com] X-Sender: crollins666@hotmail.com From: "clayton rollins" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:08 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2004 17:45:08.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[7CF2C760:01C45C6E] cc: vk7juf@southcom.com.au Subject: [from newbies] RE: IPFW2 + 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:37 -0000 On June 28, 2004, Matt wrote: > >Hello freebsd-newbies, > > I am still fairly new at the BSD level, migrated from linux. The > question that I have is, is Version 4.10 kernel compiled with IPFW2, > I know the doc's say that CURRENT version has and that it was > implemented in 2002, yet the doc's say that STABLE does not have > it compiled into the kernel. > > Can some one please clarify > > -- >Best regards, > Matt mailto:vk7juf@southcom.com.au > Hi Matt, (Can't reply on -newbies, it's a list charter thing :).) 4.x versions come from the STABLE branch and, so, do not have ipfw2 compiled in the kernel by default. (Instead, they use the older, and more tested, ipfw.) If you want ipfw2, refer to 'man 8 ipfw', the section "using ipfw2 on freebsd-stable," for very good instructions. Regards, Clayton _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 15:11:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A6D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:11:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fe1.cluster1.echolabs.net (mail.atlanticbb.net [216.52.118.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD1143D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:11:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tommoyer@atlanticbb.net) Received: from [68.114.85.228] (HELO home) by fe1.cluster1.echolabs.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 3972964 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:11:33 -0400 From: "Thomas Moyer" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:11:32 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c45c59$082c4420$6601a8c0@home> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:31:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Shared Partitions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:11:34 -0000 Okay so using a FAT partition is not a good idea. What about the other way around. Share /home/ for Windows XP to access. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 18:37:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F3A16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.175.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 712B543D4C for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@70.240.249.252 with login) by smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E91861A2; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09350-03; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B086140; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5RIbh5u003533; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <40DF13F7.2000608@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:43 -0500 From: Jon Noack User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040624) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Remi References: <36u63c$1uk902@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> In-Reply-To: <36u63c$1uk902@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at noacks.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 -0000 On 06/27/04 03:06, Remi wrote: > See that's I'm thinking, the raw performance is very attractive to me!! So > what's this about a p4 1.7 outperforming a 2.8? You got link to benchmarks? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:doconnor@gsoft.com.au] > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:23 PM > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; obrien@freebsd.org > Cc: Remi; questions@freebsd.org; current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: >>> I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. >>> Which one would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the >>> i386 would be easier to run, so I guess my question is what is >>> the state of the AMD64 FreeBSD version? >> >> You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, >> right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 >> 2.8GHz running the same OS. > > A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) > > If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. > > For raw performance it's "pretty nice" though :) He said "Pentium-M". It's a completely different processor than the Pentium 4-M. Designed for mobile computing, it is best described as combining the best features of the Pentium 3 (short(er) pipeline, etc.) and the Pentium 4 (better branch predictor, etc.) with high-end power saving features to form a third processor far superior to the previous two. Here's a first look at the chip: http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/ Some benchmarks where a 1.6GHz Pentium-M destroys a 2.2GHz Pentium 4-M: http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/centrino-13.html http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/centrino-14.html Battery life in the 6+ hour range is common with Pentium-M laptops. Here's the first look results (note the Pentium 4-M had a battery with over 20% greater capacity!): http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/centrino-17.html If you value battery life, go with the Pentium-M. If you *most highly* value performance, the Athlon64 is probably the way to go. Jon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 18:39:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D09616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:39:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F9843D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 25347936 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:24:59 -0700 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:09 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040627133909.53152dbf@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> References: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: Shared Partitions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:39:07 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:05:48 -0400 "Thomas Moyer" wrote: > I have a Fat32 partition that I use to share files between Windows > and FreeBSD. I have it mounted on /home and when it mounts the > owner of all the files is root and the group is wheel. Is there a > way to change that so it acts like a normal home partition? In other > words the individual directories and files are owned by the user > etc. Since FAT has no ability to permissions, it has to be mount as something... it defualts to root... check out the