Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:10:17 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/gdm Makefile Message-ID: <20070614181017.GB88451@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070614223309.c06691be.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <200706131619.l5DGJOtS053441@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070613183745.GB54300@rot13.obsecurity.org> <op.ttvjlqr39aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070613192541.GA55166@rot13.obsecurity.org> <op.ttvmt1il9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070614223309.c06691be.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:33:09PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:21:27 -0500 > "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > > >> >> Add a hack to fix a lot of hardcore paths of /usr/X11R6 to fix the > > >> >>problem for > > >> >> users that do not have symlink of /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local when they > > >> >>have gdm > > >> >> enable in the startup. Bump the PORTREVISION. > > >> >> Reported by: Werner Lehmann <elvis69@arcor.de> > > >> >FYI NOP changes like this shouldn't get PORTREVISION bumps. > > >> It needs to be bump for the package and other users that do not have > > >> symlink of /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local. I do not want to do it by manual or > > >> add in UPDATING for tell them to reinstall it. > > > It's not a supported configuration to run without the symlink. > > > It is a good idea to fix remaining instances of /usr/X11R6 over time, > > > but these are NOP changes and should not get PORTREVISION bumps. > > Ok next time, I won't bump and will imaging it as a 'NOP' change. I feel > > dirt to do this. > > I don't think that this change is NOP. I was embarrassed with > this problem, too. I did clean-install all ports such as Werner. > So I'm grad to get fixed binary by mezz's bumping PORTREVISION. Then the question you should be asking is "why did the symlink creation by xorg-libraries not happen?". Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070614181017.GB88451>