Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:11:22 +0200
From:      Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        "Thomas E. Zander" <riggs@rrr.de>
Subject:   Re: EHCI considered harmful?
Message-ID:  <200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org>
References:  <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1294103.B5FsbLZ2uI
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday, 29. October 2004 10:08, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote:
> > I'm just wondering why ehci doesn't make it into GENERIC for RELENG_5.
> > Are there unresolved show stoppers related to it?
>
> ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based
> USB2 disk enclosure.

Well, if we would take stability and general usefulness (even more so in=20
comparison to other USB implementations in mind) as the reference point, we=
=20
would need to disable most of USB. I think enabling ehci in GENERIC would b=
e=20
a good idea, especially since there's no loadable module...

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--nextPart1294103.B5FsbLZ2uI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.9.11 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBgkF8Xhc68WspdLARAmfmAJ9wl84wonTv+b7B4LPx/btLAoRL4QCdEx/d
SDWUevy6gM1vlR7bjAmZ1Aw=
=yO+t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1294103.B5FsbLZ2uI--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock>