From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 16 18:29:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315FA152C2 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 18:29:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id DAA19890; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 03:28:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: latest -current doesn't execute BSDI-binary bladeenc References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 17 Mar 1999 03:28:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Daniel O'Connor"'s message of "Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:36:32 +1030 (CST)" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Daniel O'Connor" writes: > On 17-Mar-99 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > The bug is on the web site, not in the kernel. David Greenman > > committed a patch to better support large memory configurations. > > Unfortunately, it seems this was not possible to achieve without > > breaking BSDI compatibility. > Would it be feasable to have an option to switch between the two? Probably. I was just about to investigate this possibility. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message